The words in ALL CAPS are defined terms that appear at the bottom of this webpage.
The Submittable online application will require the following information:
Eligibility Requirements
1. Eligible APPLICANTS
Eligible APPLICANTS include:
- Cities and counties
- Federally recognized Native American tribes
- JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY (JPA) where all members are public agencies. A JPA can include a state agency if at least one member is a local (non-state) public agency or district, and the JPA was formed for the purpose of providing PARK and recreation areas.
- Non-state agency recreation and PARK districts and special districts with authority to acquire, operate, and maintain public PARK and recreation areas.
- Eligible State Agencies: DPR, Department of Fish and Wildlife/Wildlife Conservation Board, Department of Water Resources, and The State Coastal Conservancy.
2. PROJECTS must be located in a QUALIFYING AREA with a population of at least 25,000 as indicated by the US Census TIGERWeb tool.
The Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership (ORLP) Program improves PARKS and recreation opportunities in eligible urban communities. PROJECTs must be located in one of the following QUALIFYING AREAS to be eligible:
- An Urban Area with at least 25,000 people shown in purple on the US Census TIGERWeb Tool
OR
- An Urban Area adjacent to another urban area where the combined population is 25,000 or more
OR
- A Federally Recognized Tribe’s land with any population.
If the PROJECT is located in a QUALIFYING AREA that meets at least one of the above criteria the PROJECT is Eligible.
If the PROJECT is in a 2020 designated Urban Area (as outlined above) with a population of less than 25,000, or the PROJECT is not in an Urban Area the PROJECT is Ineligible.
APPLICANTS will provide the PROJECT SITE address and accompanying report demonstrating population and eligibility. If the site does not have a street address, use the latitude and longitude of the PROJECT SITE.
Reference the TIGERWeb Tool Guidance for instructions on how to pull the required TIGERWeb report.
3. COMMITTED FUNDS and Reimbursement Process
ORLP is a reimbursement only program and requires the APPLICANT to cash flow 100% of the TOTAL PROJECT COSTS, with the understanding that ORLP can reimburse up to 50% of the TOTAL PROJECT COST. For example, for a $30 million PROJECT where the APPLICANT is seeking $15 million reimbursement in ORLP GRANT funding, the APPLICANT must certify they have COMMITTED FUNDS to fully cash-flow the $30 million PROJECT. For purpose of this proposal, “committed” means the money is already secured.
All non-federal (state, local, or private) sources are eligible for MATCH.
Federal sources eligible as MATCH for this program are:
- Community Development Block Grants (CDBG)
- Recreation Trails Program (RTP)
- Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act funding
- Readiness and Environmental Protection Integration Program (REPI) funding.
Other sources of federal funding are not eligible.
The APPLICANT will list each funding source and provide the dollar amount of that source in the application.
- Reimbursable Cash Flow Source: This amount needs to equal the ORLP GRANT request amount for up to 50% of the TOTAL PROJECT COST. This is the funding that will be used to cashflow the ORLP GRANT amount until an ORLP reimbursement is processed. For example, general funds of the agency may be identified to cash flow the ORLP GRANT amount until a reimbursement is paid.
- MATCH Source: Funding source(s) proposed for MATCH must be committed and must total at least 50% of the TOTAL PROJECT COST. APPLICANTS may only list COMMITTED FUNDS. The total amount of "committed" funds for MATCH must equal at least 50% of the TOTAL PROJECT COST.
If the APPLICANT listed and certified state, local, private, or eligible federal funding MATCH sources that equal the TOTAL PROJECT COST, with the understanding that ORLP can reimburse up to 50% of the TOTAL PROJECT COST the PROJECT is eligible.
If COMMITTED FUNDS are not available or more fundraising will be needed the PROJECT is Ineligible.
4. Timeline Confirmation
The APPLICANT will certify an understanding of the state and national competitive review timeline for this federal GRANT program. This program requires states to receive and review applications before selected applications are forwarded to NPS for entry into the national competition.
5. Confirmation of Land Ownership
The APPLICANT will certify they:
- Currently own the PROJECT property, OR
- Will purchase the PROJECT property through this GRANT program.
Property ownership will be verified by the review team prior to selection.
6. Confirmation that the entire PARK boundary will be protected for Public Outdoor Recreation in PERPETUITY
The APPLICANT agrees the PROJECT property will remain as a PARK for the public’s benefit in PERPETUITY. This federal program is subject to Title 54 U.S.C. 200.305.f.3. of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act which provides LWCF PROTECTION for public outdoor recreation benefits.
The entire PARK will be placed under federal protection for outdoor recreational use in PERPETUITY should the GRANT be awarded by NPS. This means the site, if funded, shall be owned by the GRANTEE, and remain for outdoor recreation use in PERPETUITY.
Prior to project close out and final reimbursement, all awarded projects will be required to file a Deed Restriction on the title to the property, to ensure the property is protected for public outdoor recreation in PERPETUITY.
7. Confirmation of No Ground Disturbance within PROJECT Boundary
Once an ORLP APPLICATION is submitted, the site is subject to NEPA and SECTION 106 approval and cannot have any activities associated with PROJECT implementation (or another scope of work from other funding that overlaps with the PROJECT SITE) such as grading, site preparation, staging, demolition, non-routine vegetation removal, construction, landscaping, etc. in the PROJECT SITE footprint until these federal requirements are complete. Ground disturbance before NEPA and SECTION 106 approval will disqualify the PROJECT.
PROJECT Selection Criteria
The PROJECT Selection Criteria are used to rank all statewide APPLICATIONS.
- All competing APPLICATIONS start with 0 points.
- Points are gained through the PROJECT Selection Criteria.
- The total maximum number of points for all Criteria is 100 points. APPLICANTS can earn 5 bonus points for having CEQA complete at time of application (Criterion 7).
- Technical assistance for each criterion is listed after Criterion 8
- If you have questions, contact the NPS Grants Project Officer assigned to your County
PROJECT Selection Criteria
- Type of PROJECT = 10 Points
- NEW RECREATION FEATURES = 20 Points
- Environmental DESIGN = 15 Points
- STATEWIDE COMPREHENSIVE OUTDOOR RECREATION PLAN (SCORP) = 6 Points
- Community Based Planning = 23 Points
- Partnerships = 6 Points
- CEQA Bonus Points = 5 Points
- Community CHALLENGES and PROJECT Benefits = 20 Points
PROJECT Summary (500-word limit – not scored)
APPLICANTS will provide a brief summary of the proposed PROJECT deliverables. If the PROJECT is land ACQUISITION only, the summary and criteria responses below must include a description of the proposed DEVELOPMENT that would take place within 3 years after the ACQUISITION PROJECT is complete.
Criterion 1 – Type of PROJECT
Criteria 1 evaluates how a PROJECT creates new impactful outdoor RECREATION FEATURES. The national priority for this program is to create NEW PARKS, or to create new outdoor RECREATION FEATURES that are not available in an existing PARK.
APPLICANTS will identify which of the following categories is applicable to their PROJECT.
- “NEW PARK”: the PROJECT SITE has not been a public PARK in the past, and if the GRANT is awarded, the PROJECT will acquire land for or develop a new public PARK where one currently does not exist.
- “EXPAND Existing PARK”: the PROJECT includes adding acreage to increase the official boundaries of an existing PARK. The PROJECT may also include improvements within the existing PARK boundary.
- “Improve PARK / No Expansion”: the PROJECT will take place within the existing PARK boundary and does not involve adding acreage to increase the size of the PARK boundary.
Points for 1. – Type of PARK:
- NEW PARK = 10 points
- EXPAND Existing PARK = 7 points
- Improve Existing PARK/No Expansion = 5 points
- The PROJECT will not create, EXPAND, or improve a PARK = Ineligible
Criterion 2 - New Outdoor RECREATION FEATURES
While RENOVATIONS of existing features can be part of the PROJECT, the purpose of this section is to identify what new outdoor RECREATION FEATURES are proposed, as this will make the PROJECT more competitive for the National Review Committee.
NEW RECREATION FEATURES are features that do not currently exist or a substantial RENOVATION of an existing RECREATION FEATURE to allow for new and EXPANDED use(s).
The NEW RECREATION FEATURE(s) must be outdoors.
PROJECTS that create multiple NEW RECREATION FEATURES to significantly increase the number of people or user groups that may be served will be most competitive. RENOVATION PROJECTS that appear to be a facelift or are only replacing existing RECREATION FEATURES will not score as high in the national competition.
A sample list of RECREATION FEATURES and MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITIES are listed in the technical assistance below.
Points for 2. - New Outdoor RECREATION FEATURES:
- Four or more New Outdoor RECREATION FEATURES are proposed = 20 points
- Three New Outdoor RECREATION FEATURES are proposed = 15 points
- Two New Outdoor RECREATION FEATURES are proposed = 10 points
- One New Outdoor RECREATION FEATURES is proposed = 5 points
- The PROJECT only involves RENOVATION of existing features = 0 points
Criterion 3 - Environmental DESIGN
In this section APPLICANTS will describe what environmental or ecological measures the PROJECT includes to mitigate the impacts of future natural disasters and enhance resilience for the community it serves to obtain up to 15 points.
Only include reference to measures or techniques that will be implemented as part of the ORLP funded PROJECT.
How will the PROJECT include the following sustainable techniques? For the APPLICATION to be competitive, the PROJECT should include at least four of the techniques below:
- Stormwater: Incorporate pervious surfaces or other technique(s) such as bioswales or grading to capture storm water for infiltration or irrigation, or cleanse storm water before release.
- Water Efficiency: Use of water efficient irrigation system that includes a rain sensor, evapotranspiration (ET) controllers, flow sensors, or on-site water recycling that reduces potable water consumption, or the PROJECT will not require additional use of water.
- Carbon sequestration tree planting: Identify approximately how many trees will be planted.
- Landscaping: Landscaping that excludes the use of invasive plants and instead features drought tolerant or climate appropriate non-invasive native turf, trees, shrubs, plants, and ground cover. If applicable, discuss how the landscaping minimizes the use of toxic pesticides and inorganic fertilizers.
- Wetland Creation: (subject to Safe Harbor Agreements) providing habitat, water quality improvements, flood mitigation, and outdoor recreation opportunities.
- Big-game Improvements: create winter range and migration corridor habitat.
- Natural Infrastructure Investment: for shoreline stabilization and habitat restoration.
- Community Resilience Benefits: reduced heat islands, improved air/water quality, and other benefits as justified in the PROJECT application.
Points for 3. – Environmental DESIGN
- The PROJECT will include four or more of the listed techniques. = 15 points
- The PROJECT will include three of the listed techniques. = 10 points
- The PROJECT will include one or two of the listed techniques. = 5 points
- The PROJECT will include none of the listed techniques. = 0 points
Criterion 4 – STATEWIDE COMPREHENSIVE OUTDOOR RECREATION PLAN (SCORP) Priorities
APPLICANTS will describe how the PROJECT meets the SCORP priorities. To be eligible, the PROJECT must meet at least one of these priorities. PROJECTS that meet multiple priorities will be more competitive. SCORP priorities include:
- NEW PARK Access – The response should describe how the PROJECT will qualify as a “NEW PARK” or “EXPAND an existing PARK.”
- Preservation – The response should describe whether funding by the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) was previously GRANTED for part or all of the PROJECT SITE.
- Multi-Use PARKS for All Ages – The response should describe how the PROJECT will be DESIGNED to address one or more of the following:
- DESIGNED to bring families together by supporting art and music, sports, and multi-generational activities.
- Different active and passive recreation interests of all ages.
- Incorporate PROJECT DESIGN ideas from all age groups.
- Health DESIGN Goals – The response should describe how this PROJECT results from asking community members for their PARK DESIGN ideas for public health.
- Safety and Beautification – The response should describe the how this PROJECT includes enhancements for:
- Safe public use such as lighting, netting, strategic location of features, etc.
- Beautification, such as landscaping to make the PARK more welcoming.
Points for 4. - MEETING 2021-2025 SCORP Priorities:
- One or more SCORP Priority will be met between the PROJECT elements = 6 points
- No SCORP Priority will be met = 0 points, and the PROJECT will not be recommended for funding
Criterion 5 – Community Based Planning
Describe how the APPLICANT or partnering community-based organization(s) made efforts to engage RESIDENTS to DESIGN the PARK.
Use Part A and B to detail the MEETING location schedule and outreach.
Use the two DESIGN goals in Part C to gather RESIDENTS’ ideas at the MEETINGS.
Part C encourages PROJECT enhancements that reflect the RESIDENTS’ unique needs and creativity. The national review committee will give preference to PROJECTS that expand economic opportunity for the community and demonstrate a strong, structured community engagement process that identified and incorporated RESIDENTS’ needs into the overall PROJECT plan. Photos of MEETINGS are encouraged.
Community Based Planning Part A
How many MEETINGS occurred at or near the PROJECT SITE, with RESIDENTS who primarily live within ½ mile of the PROJECT SITE? Describe why the MEETING locations and times were convenient for RESIDENTS with various schedules.
Use the response template below to list the details of each MEETING that occurred at or near the PROJECT SITE, with RESIDENTS who primarily live within ½ mile of the PROJECT SITE.
- MEETING Date/Year:
- MEETING Type:
- Venue name and address:
- Start and End Times (am/pm):
- Day of Week:
- Convenience: (Why was this an effective location and time to engage RESIDENTS near the PROJECT?)
- List the MEETINGS in chronological order.
Points for community-based planning Part A:
- The APPLICANT or partners facilitated at least 3 MEETINGS to obtain ideas from the RESIDENTS. The MEETINGS were located at or near the PROJECT SITE, with RESIDENTS who primarily live within 1/2 mile of the PROJECT SITE. At least two of the MEETINGS occurred on a weekend or in the evening. = 8 Points
- One or two MEETINGS were located at or near the PROJECT SITE, with RESIDENTS who primarily live within 1/2 mile of the PROJECT SITE. One of the MEETINGS occurred on a weekend or in the evening. = 4 Points.
- MEETINGS were not located at or near the PROJECT SITE, with RESIDENTS who primarily live within 1/2 mile of the PROJECT SITE. Or none of the MEETINGS occurred during a weekend or an evening. = 0 Points
Community Based Planning Part B
For each MEETING listed in the response to Community Based Planning Part A, what method(s) did the APPLICANT or partnering community-based organization(s) use to invite RESIDENTS? In the combined set of MEETINGS, was there a BROAD REPRESENTATION of RESIDENTS?
Structure the response using the template below to describe the method of invitation. Include the number and general description of the RESIDENTS who participated in each MEETING.
*MEETINGs must be listed in the same order as Criteria 5A - Community Based Planning - MEETING Details.
- Invite Method: (Describe how RESIDENTS were invited to this MEETING)
- Number of RESIDENTS: (How many RESIDENTS attended in person?)
- Describe who attended: (Youth, Families, Seniors, Adults, etc.)
Points for Community Based Planning Part B:
- For the combined set of MEETINGS, at least three different methods were used to invite a BROAD REPRESENTATION of RESIDENTS. The number and general description of the RESIDENTS who participated in the combined set of MEETINGS consisted of a BROAD REPRESENTATION. = 5 Points
- For the combined set of MEETINGS, two different methods were used to invite a BROAD REPRESENTATION of RESIDENTS. The number and general description of the RESIDENTS who participated in the combined set of MEETINGS consisted of a BROAD REPRESENTATION . = 3 Points
- For the combined set of MEETINGS, one method was used to invite a BROAD REPRESENTATION of RESIDENTS. The number and general description of the RESIDENTS who participated in the combined set of MEETINGS consisted of a BROAD REPRESENTATION. = 1 Point
- The number and general description of the RESIDENTS who participated in the combined set of MEETINGS did not consist of a BROAD REPRESENTATION. Or only an advocacy group or league likely to promote a specific type of PROJECT was involved. Or no RESIDENTS were invited, or MEETINGS did not occur. = 0 Points
Community Based Planning Part C
During the MEETINGS that occurred, how were the RESIDENTS enabled to DESIGN the PARK using Goals 1-2?
Structure the response by providing the “Process” descriptions and “List” of ideas for the goals shown below.
Goal 1 Selecting RECREATION FEATURES and DESIGN ELEMENTS
The RESIDENTS engaged in a process to reach a general agreement on the selection of the RECREATION FEATURE(S) and DESIGN ELEMENTS for those RECREATION FEATURE(S).
Process to Select the RECREATION FEATURES
- Describe the process used to enable RESIDENTS to identify, prioritize, and then select, RECREATION FEATURE(S), DESIGN ELEMENTS and sense of place for the proposed PROJECT. The goal is to ask RESIDENTS what they want in the PARK.
List of RECREATION FEATURE(s) DESIGN ELEMENTS
- List the RESIDENTS’ ideas that will be included in the detailed DESIGN of the RECREATION FEATURE(S). Avoid listing ideas that will not be part of this PROJECT paid with GRANT funds plus MATCH.
- DESIGN elements should not be limited to a few predetermined options presented by the APPLICANT to the RESIDENTS at the MEETING. RESIDENTS should be given a blank slate as a starting point in DESIGNING the PARK.
Goal 1 Points – Selection of the RECREATION FEATURE(S) and DESIGN Elements
A maximum of 5 points can be scored for this criterion
- The response clearly shows that the RESIDENTS identified their preferred RECREATION FEATURE(S) (not limited to a few predetermined options presented by the APPLICANT). Then, the RESIDENTS selected RECREATION FEATURES for the proposed PROJECT = 3 Points
- The response clearly shows that the RESIDENTS provided ideas for DESIGN ELEMENTS for the selected RECREATION FEATURE(S) that will be implemented for this PROJECT. = 2 Points
- The APPLICANT’S response does not address any of the elements of Goal 1. = 0 Points
Goal 2 Alignment with Community Needs
APPLICANTS will describe opportunities that are applicable to the PROJECT and provide a short answer for each opportunity selected.
To what extent does the PROJECT:
- Provide employment, job training, or volunteer opportunities, directly related to the project, for youth or people living within the QUALIFYING AREA
Points for goal 2
- The PROJECT will include at least one of the above opportunities. = 5 points
- The PROJECT will not include at least one of the above opportunities. = 0 points
Criterion 6 – Partnerships
The purpose of this section is to highlight public-private partnerships to leverage support for this PROJECT. Past successful outdoor recreation PROJECTS have included partnerships among public and private sectors, multiple levels of government, private/non-profit organizations, and community groups.
- What is the name and the general purpose of the partner’s organization/agency?
- What is the partnership role specific to this PROJECT? Provide a summary of the role.
Points for 6 - Partnerships
The PROJECT involves three or more partners providing volunteer hours, materials, or funding for DESIGN, preconstruction, land ACQUISITION, or construction. = 6 points
The PROJECT involves two partners providing volunteer hours, materials, or funding for DESIGN, preconstruction, land ACQUISITION, or construction. = 3 points
The PROJECT involves one partner providing volunteer hours, materials, or funding for DESIGN, preconstruction, land ACQUISITION, or construction. = 1 point
The PROJECT involves no partners. = 0 points
Criterion 7 – CEQA
PROJECTS that are selected by NPS for funding will have 1-year to complete all POST-SELECTION FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. These include environmental and cultural requirements, which can be very time-consuming. Completing these requirements before being selected is not required, however PROJECTS that have completed CEQA will receive bonus points.
- Completed CEQA includes submitting one of the following:
- A Notice of Exemption filed with, and stamped by, the county clerk, OR
- An Initial Study with a Negative Declaration and a copy of the Notice of Determination filed with, and stamped by, the county clerk, OR
- An Initial Study and an Environmental Impact Report and a copy of the Notice of Determination filed with, and stamped by, the county clerk,
AND
- Submit a State Clearinghouse Filing Receipt showing that CEQA was filed. For more information on filing with the State Clearinghouse, see www.opr.ca.gov and follow links for CEQA.
The submitted CEQA documents should be PROJECT specific, covering the proposed PROJECT area and all PROJECT components that will be funded with ORLP GRANT funding and/or MATCH funding.
If you have not started CEQA yet, please start now! Ongoing CEQA can affect the NPS review and required consultations timeline if chosen.
Points for 7 – CEQA
- CEQA complete at time of application. = 5 Bonus Points
Criterion 8 – Community CHALLENGES and PROJECT Benefits (1,000 words or less)
Provide information on specific barriers to access the community may have to PARKS, conservation areas, and outdoor recreation opportunities AND describe how the PROJECT will address these barriers and provide community benefits.
- Describe the community CHALLENGES that impact the community in relevant ways AND discuss how the PROJECT will address these CHALLENGES, which may include:
- Community health and safety
- Resilience to natural disasters
- Avoidance of legacy pollution
- Access to clean water and air
- Others as applicable
Points for 8 – Community CHALLENGES and PROJECT Benefits
OGALS will use information in the entire application to assess the community CHALLENGES and PROJECT benefits compared to all applications submitted statewide.
- The community has high CHALLENGES compared to other applications and the PROJECT will significantly improve the community’s recreation opportunities compared to applications statewide. = 10 – 20 points
- The community has average CHALLENGES compared to other applications and the PROJECT will create average benefits for the community compared to applications statewide. = 4 - 9 points
- The community has minimal CHALLENGES compared to other applications and the PROJECT will minimally improve the community recreation opportunities compared to applications statewide. = 1-3 points
The total maximum number of points for all Criteria is 100 points. Plus 5 bonus points for having CEQA complete at time of application.
This concludes the scored criteria for this program.
Required Application Attachments
Site Plan
Provide a legible drawing showing where the RECREATION FEATURES and MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITIES will be located in the PARK. This does not need to be an architectural rendering it can be a simple drawing.
- Identify only the RECREATION FEATURES and MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITIES that are being proposed for this GRANT plus MATCH only. Differentiate or shade out any pre-existing or future phase items that will not be part of the PROJECT proposal.
- Provide a legend/key to visually explain all symbols used on the CONCEPT LEVEL SITE PLAN. Include a north arrow and street names along the PROJECT SITE.
- The language used to label the RECREATION FEATURES and MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITIES on the site plan should be consistent with language used in the Budget Narrative.
Budget Narrative Estimate
Using the template provided, submit a budget narrative estimate for the PROJECT. The budget must include all PROJECT elements and RECREATION FEATURES that are shown on the site plan.
Note that administrative costs are capped at 7% of the total GRANT amount.
Follow these guidelines when completing your Budget Narrative:
Listing the RECREATION FEATURE(S) and MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITY(S)
Each distinct RECREATION FEATURE and MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITY needs to be listed on its own line.
Use the following phrases to describe the type of work for each RECREATION FEATURE and MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITY:
- “Acquire approximately _____.” (provide acreage and associated parcel numbers that will be acquired).
- Identify the RECREATION FEATURE or MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITY. Include the specific type and approximate quantity (if known). Add “with lighting,” “with shade,” or “with fencing,” if applicable.
- See examples below:
Athletic Fields or Courts:
Specify the type and number of each separate athletic field or court. For example, instead of listing “new athletic courts” write it as “two full basketball courts with lighting,” “futsal court with fencing,” or “four pickleball courts.” If an athletic field or court will be multi-use, list as “a multi-use field” or “a multi-use court” and specify the type of uses. Each type of athletic field or court needs to be on a separate line. Using the above examples, the different types of athletic courts would be listed on separate lines.
Play Areas:
Like sports courts and fields, play areas need to be specific to the number of separate and distinct play areas. Include intended ages for use. For example: “two ages 5-12 playground areas” if the PROJECT involves two distinct and separate playgrounds in different locations of the PARK.
Group Picnic Areas:
If a picnic/barbeque area is designed for the purpose of group gatherings, with multiple tables located near each other, identify the specific number of group picnic areas (not the number of tables and barbeque grills). For example, “three group picnic/barbeque areas with shade structures.”
Support Amenities more than $50,000 “throughout the PARK”:
If lighting, access pathways, signs, benches, tables, landscaping, or fencing (more than $50,000) will be installed throughout the PARK and are not specific to a RECREATION FEATURE or MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITY, list them separately.
See examples below:
- “Lighting throughout the PARK.”
- “Landscaping throughout the PARK.”
- “Benches and tables throughout the PARK.”
MINOR SUPPORT AMENITIES less than $50,000:
If lighting, access pathways, signs, benches, tables, landscaping, drinking fountains, fixed bike racks, trash receptacles, fencing, etc. (less than $50,000) will be installed throughout the PARK, bundle these MINOR SUPPORT AMENITIES into a single line item. Do not list specific quantities for amenities. (ex: MINOR SUPPORT AMENITIES: benches, trash receptacles, and drinking fountains = $15,000)
Optional Application Attachments
Photo Uploads
- PROJECT Site Photos: Provide high-quality JPEG (5MB or larger) photos of the PROJECT SITE. Include captions to orient the reviewer. These photos may be used for potential “before and after” photos.
- MEETING Photos (Community Engagement/PARK Planning MEETINGS): Provide high-quality JPEG (5MB or larger) photos that show RESIDENTS engaged in park planning/DESIGN.
Technical Assistance
Criterion 1 – Type of PROJECT
NEW PARKS
- Qualifies as a NEW PARK: Land zoned or designated to become a PARK, but not yet developed and open to the public prior to the current round APPLICATION due date.
- Does not qualify as a NEW PARK: Land developed and open to the public as a PARK.
- In built-out communities, a NEW PARK can be created by acquiring and demolishing a blighted building or a street can be vacated and permanently redeveloped into a PARK.
EXPAND Existing PARKS
- To EXPAND an existing PARK, the PROJECT will acquire or develop land that is currently not part of the ADJACENT existing PARK boundary. This includes adding new acreage of PARK SPACE that is easily accessible next to or across the street from an existing PARK.
- If a PROJECT will EXPAND an existing PARK, the APPLICANT has the option but is not required to also improve the existing PARK area. The APPLICATION will qualify and score as ‘EXPAND an Existing PARK’ for this criterion.
- If an EXPANSION is proposed to increase the PARK boundary, provide an explanation about the current use and ownership of the EXPANSION property.
RENOVATE Existing PARKS
- The PROJECT must add or RENOVATE a RECREATION FEATURE. Examples of RECREATION FEATURES are listed below for Criterion 2 Technical Assistance.
- If there is a combination of RENOVATION and NEW RECREATION FEATURES, make sure that the list is consistent with Criterion 2.
Criterion 2 - New Outdoor RECREATION FEATURES
- PROJECTS that include 4 or more new Outdoor RECREATION FEATURES will score maximum points.
- MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITIES are eligible but will not receive points for this criterion.
Examples of eligible RECREATION FEATURES include but are not limited to the following:
- Outdoor aquatic center, swimming pool, splash pad, pond, fishing pier, boat or paddling launch site
- Amphitheater/performing arts dance, music, and theater stage
- Athletic fields (soccer regulation or “futbol-rapido”, baseball, softball, football, archery, etc.)
- Athletic courts (basketball, “futsal”, tennis, pickleball, bocce ball, shuffleboard, badminton, horseshoe/cornhole, batting cages, etc.)
- Community gardens, botanical, demonstration gardens, orchards, meditation/calm zone, pollinator/butterfly garden, labyrinth garden
- Dog PARK
- Golf course (disc, mini, etc.), equestrian course
- Jogging and walking loop, par course, running track
- Outdoor fitness area, obstacle course, ropes course, rock climbing wall, zip line
- OPEN SPACE and natural areas for public recreation use
- Picnic/BBQ areas, game tables
- Playgrounds, including tot lots, universally accessible playgrounds, sensory/music play areas, nature discovery zones, etc.
- Plaza, zocalo, gazebo
- Skate PARK, skating rink, and BMX or pump track (non-motorized bike tracks), remote control track
- Trail (non-motorized), pedestrian/bicycle bridge, greenbelt/linear PARK
- Native American event sites and cultural gathering spaces
- Shooting sports facilities (archery ranges, skeet fields, safe shooting areas)
Examples of Eligible MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITIES include but are not limited to the following:
- Restroom building, snack shack
- Parking lot, staging area
- Pathway for access to a RECREATION FEATURE or throughout the PARK
- Landscaping or lighting that will be constructed throughout the PARK
- Perimeter fencing around PARK
APPLICATIONS where most of the TOTAL PROJECT COST is for MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITIES will be less competitive. PROJECTS should create a NEW RECREATION OPPORTUNITY(S) as the primary goal.
Criterion 3 – Environmental DESIGN
Only include reference to measures or techniques that will be implemented as part of the ORLP funded PROJECT. Adjacent or city/region wide initiatives will not earn points for this criterion.
Carbon Sequestration Tree Planting
If the PROJECT involves tree planting, provide an estimate of the number of trees to be planted and any other details regarding tree planting known at the time of APPLICATION. If the GRANT is awarded, GRANTEES may be required to report the following information about the PROJECTS before PROJECT COMPLETION:
- Tree species
- Size of trees at planting Information on the distance and direction to the nearest building (if applicable)
- Information on the age and climate control of any nearby buildings (if applicable)
- Information about the tree’s growing conditions
The following tools may be used to inform the responses to Criterion 3:
- The i-Tree site at www.planting.itreetools.org provides information on the benefits of different tree types and assess current tree canopies.
- The “California Invasive Plants Inventory” published by the California Invasive Plant Council: cal-ipc.org/plants/inventory.
Sustainable Landscaping
The response for landscaping may include how landscaping minimizes the use of toxic pesticides AND inorganic fertilizers.
Wetland Creation
- Information on wetlands may be in your CEQA document under Section IV. C.
- Safe Harbor Agreements/Conservation Benefit Agreements are voluntary agreements with non-Federal property owners to conserve at-risk ESA listed or candidate species. If you have an Enhancement of Survival (EOS) permit, Conservation Benefit Agreement, or Safe Harbor Agreement, please include information on the agreements/permits.
- More information on Safe Harbor Agreements can be found on the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Website: wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/CESA/Safe-Harbor-Agreements.
Big Game Habitat Improvements
- You may find information on wildlife corridors within your CEQA document under Section IV.D.
- CDFW provides a variety of viewers to show connectivity for habitat and movement data for California deer, elk, and pronghorn.
Criterion 4 – STATEWIDE COMPREHENSIVE OUTDOOR RECREATION PLAN (SCORP)
Additional information about California’s 2021-2025 SCORP can be found at https://www.PARKsforcalifornia.org/scorp
Criterion 5 – Community Based Planning
5.A: MEETING Details
Review definitions for MEETING, RESIDENTS, and PROJECT SITE to ensure responses reflect program specific definitions.
Review the “DESIGNING PARKS Using Community Based Planning” document for additional insights and guidance for PROJECT Selection Criterion #5 https://www.PARKsforcalifornia.org/planning_guide
Effective, highly used, and safe PARKS are DESIGNED using significant community input. The purpose of having MEETINGS is to promote a group dynamic, with participants building upon the ideas of one another. Engaging and interactive group discussions can lead to a more in-depth understanding of what the RESIDENTS need. APPLICANTS are encouraged to partner with community-based organizations that can help engage the RESIDENTS during the community-based planning MEETINGS.
A survey may be used during the process as a tool, but by itself, a survey will not qualify as a MEETING.
*Additionally, virtual engagement efforts will not earn points for this Criterion.
See https://www.PARKsforcalifornia.org/planning_guide for past examples of creative MEETINGS use for PARK planning and DESIGN, such as:
- Focus groups
- DESIGN workshops
- PARK DESIGN activities with students at the schools nearest to the PROJECT
MEETINGS need to be convenient for people living within 1/2 mile of the PROJECT SITE. Many RESIDENTS may not have access to reliable transportation to attend MEETINGS located outside their community. MEETINGS taking place outside of the community will be questioned for their convenience. Schedule convenient locations and times for the RESIDENTS using cost effective approaches, such as:
- MEETING locations preferably within walking distance for the RESIDENTS, such as “sidewalk MEETINGS” at the proposed PROJECT SITE. APPLICANTS or a partnering community group can set up a banner, easels, and tables on a Saturday morning and knock door-to-door inviting RESIDENTS to join neighbors and discuss PARK DESIGN ideas. In previous rounds, APPLICANTS reported that MEETINGS at the PROJECT SITE were exceptionally beneficial for the following: 1) participants gained a better sense of the PROJECT SITE and 2) sidewalk events attracted passersby to join.
- In addition to MEETINGS at the PROJECT SITE, neighborhood/community-based organizations and schools may let you use their MEETING space.
- Have MEETINGS where RESIDENTS will already be present. For example, facilitate MEETINGS with students in their classes or add to the agendas of neighborhood/community-based organization MEETINGS where RESIDENTS will be available. Use community festivals, cook-outs, and other events that attract RESIDENTS. Note that City Council meetings typically do not count.
- Schedule multiple MEETINGS to accommodate RESIDENTS with different employment and family schedules, including weekend or evening hours.
It is important that the response includes the start and end times for the Community-Based Planning MEETINGS, and an explanation as to why the MEETING locations and times were convenient for RESIDENTS who live in PROXIMITY.
5.B - MEETING Outreach Methods
Inviting the RESIDENTS is an important factor for attendance. If they do not know about the MEETINGS, they will not come. Involving a BROAD REPRESENTATION of RESIDENTS to DESIGN the PARK ensures that it will meet the specific needs of the community.
Different types of methods should be used to invite and encourage RESIDENTS to participate. Each of the following examples would count as a separate method:
- Providing incentives to attend is a technique that agencies have used to increase turnout. Make the incentives clear in the invitations.
- Partner with community leaders and organizations to assist with outreach.
- Post flyers in high foot traffic areas such as bus stops, major intersections, stores, schools, community centers, and libraries. Provide invitations and MEETING materials in predominantly spoken languages in the community. If needed, have an interpreter present at MEETINGS.
- Door-to-door in-person invitations.
- Mailed invitations.
- Notices distributed at local schools.
- Scheduling one or more MEETINGS where RESIDENTS will already be present counts as one method for inviting RESIDENTS. Note that City Council meetings typically do not count.
The cumulative effect of the MEETINGS should result in a BROAD REPRESENTATION of RESIDENTS. For example, MEETING with young people at a school, older adults at a center, or parents at a PTA MEETING may not get you a BROAD REPRESENTATION in each MEETING, but when each MEETING is added with others, the combination consists of a BROAD REPRESENTATION.
In responding to the criterion, it is important to identify the number of RESIDENTS as well as age groups that participated in the combined set of MEETINGS. General descriptions are allowed such as “adults 55+”, “teens”, “pre-teens, 10-12”, “families with small children”, etc.
5.C - DESIGN Goals
Structure the MEETINGS following the minimum goals of Criterion 5(c). For suggestions regarding RECREATION FEATURE(S) selection and DESIGN ELEMENTS, see the Designing Parks Using Community Based Planning webpage for written and visual examples of effective community-based planning strategies.
Goal 1
- Keep in mind that “not limited to a few predetermined options presented by the APPLICANT” means the RESIDENTS were given a blank slate as a starting point. Using easels or other means for the RESIDENTS to provide visuals (e.g. sketches) of their ideas is an effective way to enable the RESIDENTS to DESIGN the PARK. Encourage children to share ideas by providing them with pictures, stickers and art materials or other tools during MEETINGS. Previous APPLICANTS have reported that the best ideas came from children.
- The response must describe the process for how RESIDENTS were enabled to “...identify, prioritize, and then select” RECREATION FEATURES. Explain this process step by step.
- Describe the process for how the MEETING was facilitated to bring out detailed DESIGN ELEMENTS ideas for RECREATION FEATURES(s) from attendees. Did the MEETING planners prompt participants to get specific on how certain RECREATION FEATURES should be decorated, organized, or arranged?
- The list of the DESIGN ELEMENTS of the selected RECREATION FEATURES should represent detailed DESIGN ideas, such as theme, color, size, shape, and number.
- Playground DESIGN ELEMENTS that enrich PARK use could be nature play, swings, rope climbing, or musical play equipment, etc.
- Athletic courts and fields DESIGN ELEMENTS could by shaped by feedback from athletes and coaches on the type of surfacing, space, scoreboard, netting, fencing, lighting, sun orientation, and safety ideas.
- DESIGN elements for athletic courts and fields include a full vs. half court, type of backboard and goal standards, including three point and other lines, and surfacing.
Goal 2
APPLICANTS should describe how the PROJECT will provide employment, volunteer, or job training opportunities during the active period of the GRANT. For DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, those opportunities need be during the planning, DESIGN, and construction phases of the PROJECT.
Examples of employment, volunteer or job training opportunities
Include but are not limited to:
- Contracting with the California Conservation Corps, California Association of Local Conservation Corps (CALCC), or CCC Tribal Corps to complete parts of the PARK construction work.
- Partnering with local nonprofit organizations, schools, or social clubs to complete parts of the PARK construction work.
Criterion 6 – Partnerships
Only list partnerships related to the PROJECT’s DESIGN (community-based planning), PRE-CONSTRUCTION, land ACQUISITION, or CONSTRUCTION phase. Do not include program operation and maintenance after PROJECT COMPLETION.
Partnerships need to be specific to the PROJECT by providing volunteer hours, or materials, or funding for DESIGN, PRE-CONSTRUCTION, land ACQUISITION, or CONSTRUCTION.
Criterion 7 – CEQA
To receive these 5 bonus points, CEQA must be complete at time of application.
Criterion 8 – Community CHALLENGES and PROJECT Benefits
PROJECTS that will meet multiple needs of youth, older adults, and families will be more competitive than ones that provide a single use for a more limited group.
You may use metrics or data you’ve collected on a local level to demonstrate the unique CHALLENGES your community faces related to PARK access, recreation opportunities, health and safety, impacts from recent natural disasters, water and/or air quality issues, and other CHALLENGES as applicable.
Reference specific elements of your proposed PROJECT that will benefit the community and address the CHALLENGES outlined in your response.
We should be able to visualize how the community will be transformed if this PROJECT is funded.
ELIGIBLE COSTS Lists
Remember, for ORLP administrative costs are capped at 7%. If you have questions about what is considered an eligible cost reach out the NPS Grants Project Officer assigned to your county.
ACQUISITION ELIGIBLE COSTS
- Cost of the land, as established by the UASFLA Appraisal
- Employee services (See accounting rules for employee services explained in the GRANT ADMINISTRATION GUIDE).
- PROJECT/GRANT administration and accounting
DEVELOPMENT ELIGIBLE COSTS
PRE-AWARD COSTS
- Public MEETINGS, focus groups, and DESIGN workshop costs
- Plans, specifications, construction documents, and cost estimates
- Permits
- POST-SELECTION FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS such as CEQA, NEPA, A&R Form, and SECTION 106
- Bid packages
- Employee services: See accounting rules for employee services explained in the GRANT ADMINISTRATION GUIDE
- PROJECT/GRANT administration (excluding GRANT writing)
CONSTRUCTION COSTS
- Site preparation, grading, gutting, clearing and grubbing, and demolition
- Foundation work
- Purchase and installation of permanent equipment: Playground equipment, benches, signs, display boards, etc.
- Construction supplies and materials: May be drawn from central stock if claimed costs are no higher than supplies or materials purchased elsewhere
- Construction equipment owned by GRANTEE: Equipment owned by the GRANTEE may be charged to the GRANT for each use. For audit purposes, a report or source document must describe the work performed, indicate the hours used, relate the use to the GRANT SCOPE, and must be signed by the operator or supervisor.
- Construction equipment rented or purchased by GRANTEE: For purchased equipment, GRANT will pay for the total cost if the purchase price is less than the rental equivalent (i.e., rental price equivalent in proportion to the time the equipment is used on the GRANT SCOPE).
- Construction management, including site inspections.
- Employee services: See accounting rules for employee services explained in the GRANT ADMINISTRATION GUIDE.
- Payment of premiums on hazard and liability insurance to cover personnel and property directly connected with the PROJECT.
- PROJECT/GRANT administration and accounting.
- Miscellaneous costs: Other costs incurred during the construction phase, such as transporting materials, equipment, personnel, and communication
Ineligible Costs
- Costs incurred before or after the GRANT PERFORMANCE PERIOD. The exception is only that PRE-AWARD PLANNING COSTS are identified on the Budget Narrative and approved by NPS if the PROJECT is selected for funding.
- Overhead business expenses of the GRANTEE’S fixed or ordinary operating costs. (rent, mortgage payments, property taxes, utilities, office supplies).
- Outside PARK/PROJECT SITE boundaries as shown on the LWCF BOUNDARY MAP - Street improvements, traffic lights, or other infrastructure that is not located within the PARK/PROJECT SITE.
- Incidental costs relating to ACQUISITION of real property and of interests in real property, unless allowable under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Policies Act, P.L. 91 646. These incidental costs include preliminary title reports, appraisal fees, escrow costs, and title insurance fees – all not eligible.
- Sound systems, televisions or video equipment (non-security), and EV charging stations.
- Subscriptions (software, security, etc.)
- Facilities on public school grounds.
- Indoor facilities that support primarily non-outdoor purposes, such as destination restaurants, community centers, indoor recreation centers, educational centers, or employee housing.
- Outdoor facilities that support non-recreation purposes such as outdoor classrooms, food truck areas, or farmer’s market areas.
- Remediation work related to reversing or stopping environmental damage.
- Costs for preservation or restoration of a historic resource, unless for typical repair work on a facility that will be used as part of the PARK such as a historic pedestrian bridge or gazebo.
- Stormwater management facilities, unless serving the PARK itself.
- Non-fixed facilities and sports/play equipment such as temporary bleachers, moveable goal posts, balls, bats, rackets, pool toys, trash cans, cafe tables/chairs, etc.
- Fundraising
- Food
- GRANT Writing
- Programming costs
- Brochures
- Operation and maintenance costs
Definitions
Capitalized words and terms used in this procedural guide are defined below.
ACQUISITION – to obtain fee title of real property or a permanent easement, which gives rights for the GRANTEE to use the property as a public PARK and prioritize outdoor recreation access in PERPETUITY. A lease or rental is not considered ACQUISITION.
APPLICANT – an entity requesting GRANT funding through a COMPETITIVE process.
BROAD REPRESENTATION – inclusion of DESIGN ideas from RESIDENTS that may have different recreational needs, including youth, older adults, and families. Inclusion of people with disabilities, single adults, and immigrants are also encouraged. Sole involvement of an advocacy group or league likely to promote a specific RECREATION FEATURE does not meet this intent.
CEQA – the California Environmental Quality Act as stated in the Public Resources Code §21000 et seq.; Title 14 California Code of Regulations §15000 et seq. CEQA is a law establishing policies and procedures that require entities to identify, disclose to decision makers and the public, and attempt to lessen significant impacts to environmental and historical resources that may occur as a result of the entities’ proposed PROJECT. For more information see https://opr.ca.gov/CEQA.
CHALLENGES – conditions present in a community affecting the HEALTH and quality of life for youth, older adults, and families. Examples include a lack of safe and affordable recreational opportunities, community health and safety, resilience to natural disasters, avoidance of legacy pollution, or access to clean water and air.
COMMITTED FUNDS – at the time when the APPLICATION is sent to OGALS, the APPLICANT has possession of all funds for the TOTAL PROJECT COST (MATCH and the funding source to be reimbursed by the LWCF GRANT) that will be spent on the PROJECT or has a CONTRACT or other binding agreement with another entity(s) OBLIGATING funds that will be spent on the PROJECT. Funds that are not in the APPLICANT’S possession or not OBLIGATED through a binding agreement are not COMMITTED FUNDS.
CONTRACT – an agreement between OGALS and the GRANTEE specifying the achievement of the GRANT SCOPE within the GRANT PERFORMANCE PERIOD, and other GRANT obligations between the GRANTEE and OGALS.
DESIGN – preliminary PROJECT concepts and drawings achieved through the community-based planning MEETINGS, before the completion of engineer/construction documents.
DESIGN ELEMENTS - detailed DESIGN ideas, for the function and appearance of a RECREATION FEATURE or MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITY. These can include, but are not limited to, theme, color, size, layout, shape, material, or other structural enhancements, specific to the proposed RECREATION FEATURE or MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITY.
DEVELOPMENT – to construct a NEW RECREATION FEATURE(S) or MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITY. RENOVATION of an existing RECREATION FEATURE or MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITY is also considered DEVELOPMENT.
DPR—the California Department of Parks and Recreation, which includes OGALS, is the lead entity for administering LWCF in California.
ELIGIBLE COSTS – PRE-AWARD PLANNING COSTS and expenses incurred during the GRANT PERFORMANCE PERIOD to complete the GRANT SCOPE approved by OGALS through a fully executed CONTRACT. Costs of MINOR SUPPORT AMENITIES are combined with costs associated with RECREATION FEATURES and MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITIES.
EXPAND – the PROJECT will add NEW PARK acreage adjacent to an existing PARK.
GRANT – amount of LWCF funds made available to a GRANTEE for completion of the GRANT SCOPE during the GRANT PERFORMANCE PERIOD.
GRANTEE – an entity that has a CONTRACT with the OGALS for a GRANT.
GRANT ADMINISTRATION GUIDE – a document that provides requirements and forms for GRANT administration after an APPLICANT becomes a GRANTEE. The document can be found at LWCF GRANT ADMINISTRATION GUIDE.
GRANT PERFORMANCE PERIOD – the period of time shown on the CONTRACT starting with the date NPS OBLIGATES the funds for the PROJECT, during which ELIGIBLE COSTS may be incurred by the GRANTEE and charged to the GRANT.
GRANT SCOPE – the RECREATION FEATURES and MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITIES proposed through the PROJECT. These must be completed prior to final GRANT payment.
JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY (JPA) – an agreement between a city, county, and/or a district to perform services, cooperate with, or lend powers for the operation and maintenance of PARK land. For a JPA to be an eligible APPLICANT for the LOCAL AGENCY COMPETITIVE PROGRAM, at least one member of the JPA must be a LOCAL AGENCY and all members must be public agencies.
LWCF – Land and Water Conservation Fund GRANT program.
LWCF BOUNDARY MAP – a tool used as communication between NPS, OGALS, and GRANTEES that:
- Shows the agreed boundaries of the protected PARK site at the time of PROJECT approval pursuant to 54 U.S.C. §200305(f)(3) of the LWCF Act and Title 36, Part 59 in the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations.
- Shows key information about the site, including any other rights and interests present.
- Helps with site inspections for compliance with POST-COMPLETION PARK STEWARDSHIP STANDARDS.
When an LWCF PROJECT is completed, the land within the approved LWCF BOUNDARY MAP is placed under federal protection to preserve the public’s outdoor recreational use of the site in PERPETUITY.
LWCF PROTECTION – the area within the PROJECT SITE boundary must remain designated for outdoor public recreation use in PERPETUITY.
MATCH – amount required to make up the difference between the LWCF GRANT amount requested (the federal share) and the TOTAL PROJECT COST. The GRANTEE must cash-flow both the LWCF GRANT amount and MATCH, covering the TOTAL PROJECT COST established at the time of APPLICATION, to be reimbursed the full LWCF GRANT amount.
MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITY – a non-recreational facility located within a PROJECT SITE and necessary to support the outdoor recreation use of the PARK. Examples include parking lots, restroom buildings, lighting, landscaping, and maintenance buildings.
MEETING – RESIDENTS worked together as a group in person with the APPLICANT or with the APPLICANT’S partnering community-based organization(s) to DESIGN the PARK. The type of MEETING can be creative, cost effective, and non-traditional. Formal public hearings are not required.
NEPA – the National Environmental Policy Act. Each federal agency including NPS has its own unique NEPA process and pathways. More information is available at NPS’ NEPA Policy website: https://www.NPS.gov/subjects/NEPA/policy.htm.
NEW PARK – a PARK that did not exist before the APPLICATION deadline.
NEW RECREATION FEATURE – construction of a recreation amenity where none currently exists, or substantial RENOVATION of an existing RECREATION FEATURE to allow for new and EXPANDED use(s).
NPS – National Park Service, federal agency that oversees LWCF/ORLP.
OBLIGATE – when NPS approves a PROJECT and enters into a funding agreement with OGALS to designate the GRANT funds for the PROJECT.
OGALS – the Office of Grants and Local Services, under DPR, responsible for administering LWCF and ORLP.
OPEN SPACE – a natural or landscaped portion of the PROJECT DESIGNED specifically for active or passive outdoor recreation.
ORLP - Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership GRANT program. ORLP is a nationally competitive program targeting GRANT assistance to help qualifying urban communities.
PARK – public land that provides outdoor active or passive opportunities with RECREATION FEATURES for physical activities, social health, cultural enrichment, and nature appreciation.
PERPETUITY – the required length of time (forever) that the POST-COMPLETION PARK STEWARDSHIP REQUIREMENTS are enforced within the NPS-approved LWCF BOUNDARY MAP area.
PRE-AWARD PLANNING COSTS – ELIGIBLE COSTS incurred prior to NPS’ PROJECT approval and incurred directly pursuant to the negotiation and in anticipation of the federal award. Examples include site selection and planning, feasibility studies, CEQA/NEPA environmental review, SECTION 106, the Application and Revision Form, preliminary DESIGN, preparation of cost estimates, and construction drawings and specifications.
POST-COMPLETION PARK STEWARDSHIP REQUIREMENTS – The LWCF program has requirements for how PARKS are to be maintained and operated in PERPETUITY. Additional information on NPS’ operation and maintenance requirements is located at www.parks.ca.gov/LWCF .
POST-SELECTION FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS – documents and processes required by NPS prior to their federal PROJECT review and approval, including SECTION 106, NEPA, and other required federal forms. LOCAL AGENCIES will move forward with these requirements after the COMPETITIVE program review and selection.
PROJECT – the RECREATION FEATURES and MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITIES to be developed through the GRANT.
PROJECT COMPLETION – when the RECREATION FEATURES and MAJOR SUPPORT AMENITIES proposed through the PROJECT are complete and the facilities are open and useable by the public. With approval by OGALS, PROJECT COMPLETION may occur before the facilities are open and useable by the public.
PROJECT OFFICER – an OGALS employee in the National Park Service Grants Section who acts as a GRANT APPLICATION contact for APPLICANTS or an administration contact for GRANTEES.
PROJECT SITE – the entire PARK property.
QUALIFYING AREA -
- An urban area that has a population of 25,000 or more in the most recent census
OR
- 2 or more adjacent urban areas with a combined population of 25,000 or more in the most recent census
OR
- An area administered by a federally recognized Indian Tribe or an Alaska Native or Native Hawaiian community organization.
RECREATION FEATURE – an amenity that provides active or passive recreational use. The ACQUISITION of land is also considered a RECREATION FEATURE.
RENOVATION – improvements to an existing RECREATION FEATURE beyond its original condition so that it creates a NEW RECREATION FEATURE and EXPANDED use.
RESIDENTS – the population living primarily within a half mile of the PROJECT SITE including youth, families, and older adults.
SECTION 106 – a law codified at 54 U.S.C. § 306108, with implementing regulation set forth in 36 CFR Part 800, that requires federal agencies to consider the effects on historic properties (i.e., archaeological, tribal, and built environment cultural resources that are listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places) for federally funded or permitted PROJECTS or for PROJECTS proposed on federal land.
STATEWIDE COMPREHENSIVE OUTDOOR RECREATION PLAN (SCORP) – an analysis and report updated every ten years as required by LWCF to identify California’s public outdoor recreation needs and priorities. The most recent SCORP can be found at https://www.PARKSforcalifornia.org/scorp/.
TOTAL PROJECT COST – the estimated cost at the time of APPLICATION to complete the PROJECT, including both the LWCF GRANT plus MATCH.
UNIFORM APPRAISAL STANDARDS FOR FEDERAL LAND ACQUISITIONS (UASFLA) – appraisal standards (also known as the “Yellow Book” standards) required for federal land ACQUISITION. Compliance with UASFLA differs from the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). For more information on the specific UASFLA policies and guidance for LWCF appraisals, see the NPS LWCF MANUAL.