2026 Public Comments to Preliminary Applications

I support this project because it focuses on maintaining and protecting existing OHV routes while improving safety, signage, and rider education. These efforts are critical to keeping riders on designated trails, reducing environmental impacts, and preventing unnecessary closures. Continued maintenance and monitoring help ensure long-term access for the off-road community while promoting responsible recreation. This is exactly the type of project needed to sustain and enhance OHV opportunities in the Eastern Sierra. Katie Gustavsen - 3/17/2026

I do not support Project Area 4 in the proposed Ground Operations project because it lacks a valid Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) nexus. The Alabama Hills National Scenic Area is primarily used for dispersed camping, hiking, photography, and rock climbing, with minimal OHV opportunities. The limited amount of green sticker route mileage in that area does not justify ground-disturbing maintenance under an OHV funding program. However, I support funding OHV-related maintenance and facility operations that directly serve the OHV community, including: • Maintenance and pumping services for OHV-accessible campgrounds such as the Poleta Open Area. • Enhanced signage and mapping for OHV routes, particularly in the Tungsten Hills and Volcanic Tablelands areas, which are heavily used by green sticker riders and have clear OHV relevance. I encourage the BLM Bishop Field Office to prioritize areas with established OHV use patterns for future project funding and maintenance focus to ensure that OHV grant dollars produce maximum benefit for riders and public land stewardship. Randy Gillespie Aventure Trail System of the Eastern Sierra - 3/26/2026

As a resident of the Eastern Sierra, I strongly support this grant application because it directly invests in the responsible management and long-term sustainability of our public lands, which are central to both our local quality of life and our economy. This project’s focus on maintenance, signage, education, and resource protection will help keep users on designated routes, reduce environmental damage, and improve safety and visitor experience. Efforts like trail and campground maintenance and public outreach are essential to preserving access while protecting sensitive habitats and cultural resources, ensuring these amazing places remain available for future generations to enjoy. Liz Stuart - 3/27/2026

I’d like to voice my support for the Ground Operations project. I visit the Eastern Sierra regularly. Access to both motorized and non motorized recreation is important to me and my friends I hope this grant will continue to help support all the maintenance activities that sustain the BLM managed land in the Eastern Sierra. James Halfacre - 3/27/2026

I’m writing to express my strong support for the BLM Bishop Field Office Ground Operations grant. As a frequent visitor to the Alabama Hills National Scenic Area and the Eastern Sierra, my family and I have developed a deep appreciation for this remarkable landscape and the care that goes into maintaining it for the public. Over the years, I’ve noticed meaningful improvements throughout the Bishop Field Office, including upgraded and better-maintained signage, campground improvements, and consistent upkeep that makes these public lands more accessible and enjoyable. These changes have made a real difference in both the visitor experience and keeping the landscape looking natural. The proposed route maintenance in busy areas like the Alabama Hills helps preserve access while minimizing impacts. Maintenance of campgrounds, dispersed recreation areas and open OHV areas allows visitors to enjoy the landscape responsibly. I especially value the proposal of getting BLM staff on the ground, whether it’s removing graffiti, picking up trash, providing maps and outreach to visitors, or repairing and replacing signage. These efforts are essential to keeping the Alabama Hills and surrounding BLM areas beautiful, welcoming, and sustainable for all OHV users. Continued funding for these operations is critical. Supporting this grant means supporting stewardship, education, and the long-term health of a place that so many people value and enjoy. I hope this project is funded and I can't wait to visit again. Greg Stahl - 3/27/2026

I’m a resident of the Eastern Sierra based in Bishop and strongly support funding for the BLM Bishop Field Office Ground Operations project. This area is a world-class recreation destination, with over 2,300 miles of routes supporting a wide range of users including hikers, climbers, campers, and OHV riders. Maintaining this system is essential not just for recreation, but for protecting the surrounding landscape and ensuring long-term sustainability. One of the most important aspects of this proposal is trail and route maintenance, particularly efforts to repair tread, address erosion, and stabilize routes. These improvements are critical because degraded trails often lead to off-route travel, which increases damage to soils, vegetation, and cultural resources. Keeping users on clearly maintained routes is one of the most effective ways to balance recreation with conservation. I also strongly support the project’s emphasis on: Trash and graffiti removal, which directly improves the experience for all users and protects the character of the Eastern Sierra Signage and route delineation, which reduces user conflict, improves safety, and helps people stay on legal routes Campground and facility maintenance, which helps concentrate use in appropriate areas and reduces dispersed impacts on the landscape Public outreach and education, including on-the-ground ranger presence and visitor center support, which plays a major role in promoting responsible recreation Environmental monitoring and resource protection, especially efforts to track impacts to sensitive habitats and cultural sites The proposal also demonstrates strong use of data-driven management, including route condition monitoring and prioritization of maintenance based on observed conditions. This kind of approach ensures funding is used efficiently and where it’s needed most. Finally, I appreciate the collaboration with local partners, volunteers, and organizations. These partnerships are critical in a place like the Eastern Sierra, where recreation demand is high and stewardship requires a shared effort. Overall, this is a well-rounded project that supports recreation access while actively protecting the natural and cultural resources that make this area so special. Continued investment in these types of ground operations is essential for maintaining the quality and sustainability of recreation on the Eastside. Casey Cordi - 3/30/2026

This request for funding should be approved. Inyo National Forest has experienced a huge increase in the numbers of people who recreate in Inyo and Mono counties and that trend it is going to continue. Most of these folks access the forest by vehicle. Public compliance with all forest laws and regulations ensures that we will have a beautiful and healthy forest to enjoy for years to come. Enforcement needs all the help it can get to properly patrol an area this size and this remote. The contacts I have had with their officers in the field have been great. Pat Woods - 5/3/2026

Fort Sage and Rice Canyon offer great dirtbike riding opportunties and facilites. Due to the sandy terrain maintence is needed. Thank you to the BLM staff for their hard work! Bill Pinder - 3/20/2026

Despite the high amount of money asked for in El Centro BLM's applications, this is modest considering how many visitors they receive as well as the rowdy nature of many of the visitors. We appreciate the reasonable hourly rates for the law enforcement (we have seen much higher elsewhere). The fact that we don't hear negative comments about management at the Dunes or Superstition OHV areas means BLM is doing a great job. Our organization (SDORC) holds a large annual event on El Centro BLM'S land and our permit application is always processed fairly. Keep up the good work and let us know if you need anything from us (like a desert cleanup) Ed Stovin - 4/25/2026

I support funding the Needles Field Office BLM Law Enforcement Grant. Four officers patrolling over 3 million acres and 18 wilderness areas id a monumental task that should be assisted by OHV grants. David Roan - 5/2/2026

I support funding the Needles Field Office BLM Law Enforcement Grant. Four officers patrolling over 3 million acres and 18 wilderness areas id a monumental task that should be assisted by OHV grants. David Roan - 5/2/2026

Hello, I grew up and still reside in the Shasta county area. I grew up in a family of OHV enthusiasts and married into a family of OHV enthusiasts. The Chappie OHV area has been a huge part of our family life and one the greatest assets to OHV enthusiasts both locally and from afar. I have both competed in sanctioned events and used the area recreationally. At times I have utilized the trail system multiple days a week. Our area has a long history of competitors and teams riding and training at Chappie who have competed successfully in multi-national events. Chappie OHV’s connection to the surrounding area makes it a great stop for adventurers and overlanders. The campground’s scenic setting at the base of Shasta Dam is incredible. I would greatly appreciate the continued investment in this area’s OHV infrastructure. Brent - 3/11/2026.

The San Diego Off Road Coalition would like to comment on the Ridgecrest BLM grant applications. We love the development application to make the road going into Dove Springs safer. It's good to see this office using volunteer hours to add to the match. 200 volunteer hours is pretty modest and should be straightforward to get. We are not sure why your law enforcement rates are $20 per hour higher than El Centro BLM's? It feels like there is a problem with the safety and education application asking for money for law enforcement to educate. I am not sure if that is allowed in the grants. Can anyone inform me? Otherwise, these applications manage some much loved OHV areas and should be funded a much as possible. Ed Stovin - 4/25/2026

I spoke with the staff at Rowher off-road area earlier this year, and they were very informative and friendly. I appreciate their hard work as the trails are always well identified and maintained. One thing I would like to see is more shade ramadas available since this area is located near the high desert, where it is always hot! I support the funding and grants that help keep these opportunities available to the public. Tim Smithson - 4/22/2026

We are commenting on behalf of the San Diego Off Road Coalition. The north application seems like a lot for eight miles of trails. Is there any way we can get more miles of routes? I will volunteer to help like I did at Corral Canyon. The south grant is very modest considering how much use the area gets. We are having a trail maintenance day this weekend and we typically one hundred volunteers working half a day. Thanks Gabe for keeping our area on track and see you Saturday. Ed Stovin - 4/28/2026

This project meets a critical need for sustaining OHV recreation in this highly visited area. The Caldor Fire impacted large portions of the Eldorado Forest, shifting use patterns and concentrating use in certain areas. The proposed activities address some of the impacts from the changes in use. In the future, I would encourage the Forest to include more for routine maintenance of the many miles of trail on the Forest, including in those areas affected by the Caldor Fire. The project identifies work to be done to clearly address where vehicle travel has gone off of designated routes or created new unauthorized routes. However, it is not clear if this is being done by volunteers or Forest Staff. This work is critical to the long term availability of the designated routes. As such, I would encourage the Forest to include adequate funding to ensure this work is completed in a timely and efficient manner. Lester Lubetkin - 3/11/2026

I am submitting this comment in opposition to the Inyo National Forest OHV grant proposal based on deficiencies relative to OHMVR program priorities, scoring criteria, and demonstrated public benefit. While I recognize that planning grants are an eligible use of OHMVR funding, eligibility alone does not justify funding. Planning projects should demonstrate a clear and credible pathway to on the ground implementation, including identified follow up actions, prioritization of specific maintenance needs, and a realistic ability to execute improvements within existing regulatory constraints. In this case, the proposal does not establish that connection. Given current limitations surrounding travel management and route designation, it is unclear how the data collected through this project will translate into actionable outcomes such as trail additions, maintenance, or improved access. Without that linkage, the project risks becoming an internal planning exercise rather than delivering measurable benefits to the OHV community. First, the proposal is primarily a planning and inventory project with no clear commitment to performing maintenance, repairs, or improvements. OHMVR funds are intended to support tangible outcomes such as trail maintenance, restoration, and sustainable access. This proposal instead allocates the majority of funding toward data collection and administrative functions, with no guaranteed implementation of improvements. As written, the project produces information rather than results. Without committed follow on funding or identified maintenance actions, the benefit to OHV users is speculative and does not meet the intent of the program. Second, the budget is heavily weighted toward staff time and seasonal labor, with minimal allocation toward materials, equipment, or actual trail work. This raises significant concerns regarding cost effectiveness and whether OHV trust funds are being used to support agency staffing rather than recreation outcomes. Third, the proposal places significant emphasis on documenting unauthorized routes and incursions into restricted areas. While compliance is important, the project lacks balance and does not include measurable commitments to expand riding opportunities, add routes to the MVUM, or improve existing trail conditions. The only reference to adding routes is described as a possibility, with no defined metrics, targets, or examples of past success. This creates a strong likelihood that the data collected will be used to justify closures rather than enhance access. Fourth, current federal policy direction indicates that travel management frameworks are under review and may be subject to change. Given this uncertainty, and the fact that route designations require formal environmental analysis and public process, it is unclear how the proposed project can realistically achieve its stated goal of influencing route designation or adding trails to the MVUM in the near term. This calls into question the feasibility and timing of the project’s stated benefits. Fifth, the proposal contains internal inconsistencies. The Forest states that it already conducts monitoring, maintains databases, and performs patrols across its system, yet simultaneously claims a need to create a comprehensive inventory framework. This duplication suggests that the project may not represent a true unmet need, but rather a refinement of existing internal processes. Sixth, public engagement for this proposal appears limited. The application cites minimal outreach and participation, which does not demonstrate broad support from the OHV community. Finally, the proposal does not address the known maintenance backlog across the Inyo National Forest. Lack of maintenance leads directly to resource damage, safety concerns, and eventual closure of routes. Prioritizing additional study over actual maintenance delays needed action and does not serve the recreating public. In summary, this proposal prioritizes planning over implementation, staffing over stewardship, and enforcement over access. Given the lack of committed maintenance outcomes, questionable cost effectiveness, and uncertainty regarding travel management applicability, I respectfully request that this application be denied or rescored to reflect these deficiencies. OHV funds should be directed toward projects that perform actual maintenance and restoration, improve trail conditions and sustainability, and expand or secure continued access for the recreating public. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Scott Stoner Dirt Ninjas OHV volunteer group - 3/17/2026

I strongly oppose allocating funding for another planning-focused grant for the United States Forest Service in the Inyo National Forest. The justification for additional planning is not supported by past outcomes. Similar efforts conducted in the 1990s resulted primarily in widespread trail closures, with little to no corresponding reinvestment in trail maintenance, system improvements, or enhanced recreational access. The current proposal risks repeating that pattern—delaying meaningful action while further restricting responsible use. The Inyo already has extensive data, route designations, and management frameworks in place. What is lacking is not information, but implementation. The OHV system is in clear need of immediate, on-the-ground improvements, including trail maintenance, restoration of damaged routes, better signage, and improved connectivity. Approving another multi-year planning effort diverts limited funding away from projects that would produce measurable, immediate benefits. A three-year delay in action is not justified when the need for maintenance and repair is already well understood. Additionally, the proposal does not adequately emphasize collaboration with the very user groups who have the most at stake. OHV communities, volunteers, and local stakeholders have consistently demonstrated a willingness to assist with stewardship, monitoring, and maintenance. Their involvement should be central—not secondary—to any funded effort. Thank you, Randy Gillespie Adventure Trails System of the Eastern Sierra - 3/25/2026

I oppose funding this proposed planning grant for Inyo National Forest. (INF) for the following reasons. INF already has extensive route inventories and road designations that were completed during the Travel Management program and that were used to build the existing MVUM. That program closed many valuable existing routes. The forest currently conducts patrols of the roads, monitors activity and inventories road conditions and storm damage. Some of this information is also obtained from OHV groups at no cost to the forest. Approval of this project diverts funding and personal away from the backlogged maintenance, repair and improvement of forest roads. INF needs to use the resources it has to complete the maintenance backlog that exists rather than use what resources it has to launch into a new project. I understand that new agency policy may dictate that INF redo the Travel Management system. If that in fact happens will require a complete updated inventory that should be supported by government funding not green sticker funds. Thank you for allowing us to comment, Pat Woods - 5/3/2026

Hello, I'm writing in support of the Los Padres National Forest's ground operations grant proposal. I've lived in the Frazier Park area for over 30 years and enjoy our surrounding mountains and OHV opportunities especially the trails on the Mt Pinos & Santa Lucia Districts. Our current Mt Pinos and Santa Lucia District rangers Karina Medina, Ben Gray and Mt Pinos Recreation officer Ari Songer have worked much closer with local volunteers, personally helped on OHV trail projects and have been more helpful with OHV user groups than previous forest management I've experienced Please consider fully funding their grant application to help them continue with the great work they've been doing! Thank you for your time! Tommy Hastings - 3/6/2026

To: California Department of Parks and Recreation, Off-Highway Motorized Vehicle Recreation Division Regarding: USFS Los Padres National Forest Ground Operations Grant (G26-02-09-G01) As an officer of a local 4WD club and an active member of the off-road community, I am writing to express my strong support for the Los Padres National Forest (LPNF) Ground Operations grant. Our club is committed to the stewardship of these lands and frequently exceeds the required matching hours to ensure these trails remain a viable resource for the public.I specifically support the following elements of the application: Staff and Equipment (Section 2 and Deliverables 1-2): I support the funding for essential staff time, heavy equipment (such as dozers and excavators), and materials like culverts and riprap. These resources are critical for the "Level 2" maintenance required to reestablish trail ways after major weather events. Safety and Rapid Response (Section 2 and Section B): It is vital that the Forest Service has the funding to remove downed trees and repair landslides quickly. Keeping trails open and safe for public use is our highest priority, and this grant provides the mechanical necessity to do so. Volunteer Support and Training (Deliverable 1 and Cost Estimate): We appreciate the inclusion of funding for personal protective equipment and the recognition of "qualified volunteers" in the project deliverables. Proper training and safety gear allow our club members to work alongside FS staff more effectively. Location-Specific Maintenance (Deliverable 4 and Section D): I strongly support the continued maintenance of Rockfront, Miranda Pines, Bates Canyon, and the Divide Peak/West Camino Cielo area. These areas offer unique riding experiences and require the toilet pumping and trash services requested to remain open and sanitary for the community. Resource Protection (Deliverable 7): Protecting historical and archaeological resources is paramount. We support the funding for archaeologists and specialists who ensure that motorized recreation remains compatible with the protection of the forest’s cultural heritage.T he Los Padres National Forest provides wonderful, local OHV opportunities that are essential for regional recreation. We look forward to continuing our partnership with the Forest Service to implement these projects. In service and support, Matt Beecher Treasurer, Santa Maria 4 Wheelers - 4/14/2026

I support this grant to maintain OHV trails in Los Padres National Forest. I ride motorcycles, and offroad my car here regularly, and it’s one of the closest and best places for me to get outside. Keeping these trails maintained makes a huge difference—not just for safety, but for actually being able to ride and enjoy the area. I’ve recently introduced a couple friends to riding here, and as a young dad, I’m really looking forward to bringing my kid out someday too. Having well-maintained, accessible trails is what makes that possible. These trails matter to people like me who just want to get outside, ride, and enjoy public lands responsibly. I hope this funding continues so we can keep doing that. Christian Cummins - 4/17/2026

I would like to submit my comment for the G26 grant for the Mendocino National Forest. I live in Kelseyville and have been going into the National Forest since 1968. I was also lucky enough to be able to go into the Mendocino National Forest as a CHP Officer and enforce the laws to make the National Forest a safer place for the public. I have since retired in 2009 and can spend more time going into the National Forest and volunteer my time on working on the roads and trails. I have one suggestion what I would like to see done with some of the grant money. Out of the Middle Creek Campground and staging area, there are two trails leaving from there and going up to the Lower Deer Valley road giving you access to the National Forest. Both of those trails are for 50" or less vehicles. On one of my volunteer days, I asked the trail dozer operator if it would be hard to widen one of those trails out to a 70" or less trail for the Side by Side (SxS) vehicles. He advised me that it would not be difficult. I use to ride dirt bikes in the National Forest. As I have gotten into my 70s, I've gone to the SxS so its more comfortable for my wife and I to enjoy the National Forest and still Volunteer to work to keep the trail and roads open. I would like to be able to park our motorhome in the Middle Creek campground and ride out of there. We have several friends in our age group that would like to join us there. The only place that we can go to camp and ride our SxS now is at the Deer Valley campground and taking a motorhome, even a small one into that campground with miles of dirt road is pretty rough on a motorhome. Penny Pines campground at the paved Elk Mountain road is also only for 50" or less vehicles. I don't understand why all the good campground, just off the paved roads, are for the 50" or less vehicles. At some point those young motorcycle riders are going to age and want to go to a more comfortable SxS to enjoy the National Forest. Please take into consideration in widening one of the two trails (hopefully trail 04) coming out of the Middle Creek campground staging areas to a 70" or less trail so us senior riders can still enjoy the Mendocino National Forest. I've been asking for this for years. I've sent comments before to the grant recipients, talked to people at the Upper Lake Ranger Station, talked to Rangers out on the trails when we've volunteered and as you can see I also talked to the dozer operator. Since I have asked so many times, I'm beginning to think the Mendocino National Forest really don't care about the retired senior population. What a shame. Sincerely, Craig Van Housen - 4/21/2026

Since I am now retired, I am commenting as general public: Some technical comments: 7c: Adin office has no MVUM maps; do other offices? 8b: Does the MDF have evidence of wildlife population-level monitoring (including change detection,) or evaluation of OHV impact monitoring? I haven't for at least last 15 years. 9c: With 3300 miles of OHV roads and current staff, how is it possible to monitor monthly as claimed? 11a: Educational materials onsite: see 7c 11c: Visitor centers/offices have not been staffed daily (with paid staff) 12b: Adin office public phone often out of service Concerning Habitat Mgt Plan for OHV grant: I have never seen one. Please send the HMP for 2025 application so I have an example. I am curious because I am seeing less coordination of road work with wildlife occurrences than previous decades. This can be relative (e.g. mastication will have more effect than grading; work on well-traveled roads generally has less impact than work on rarely-used roads.) Also see more comments in Ground Ops document. Thanks, Julie Rechtin - 5/3/2026

Again, as I am retired, I am commenting as general public. 2. Contracts: 3 Resource techs: what divisions does this include? I would assume not arch or rec as they are already mentioned. So hydro, botany, wildlife, maybe even fuels, wild horses, or range? Farm Bureau: I wondered where Farm Bureau $ came from; now I know at least one source. I do object to justifications of difficult USFS hiring bureaucracy for using Farm Bureau employees. And the folllowing comment has NOT been my experiene: "Labor hired through Modoc Co Farm Bureau works on the forest with forest staff as if they were forest employees." Farm Bureau employees don't have the same access to computer systems, they are not BUEs with NFFE, they don't have the same rights (even holidays or sick leave) or benefits (no subsidized health insurance or time toward annual leave,) they are paid on a different schedule, use different accounting, have different work restrictions (including recently not being allowed as fire militia, taking fire training or WCT) Their positions aren't llsted on USAJobs, so different outreach is required. And I noted that this year, the only USFS techs advertised were Timber and Rec; all -oologists were Farm Bureau. This is really inefficient. Also, the Wildlife techs have been prioritized toward timber sale/veg management support, not assisting with roads. And no one funds Wildlife enough to maintain NRM (both Wildlife and Aquatic) to the level necessary for the claimed uses (see Item 8 in Application). Species, territories, and reproduction status entered are more focused on timber/fuels management projects. 6. Impacts to Natural and Cultural Resources: Rerouting trails to divert from riparian/wetlands isn't checked. It needs to be considered so it can be checked. Some examples of two-tracks that impact the edges of intermittent lakes including in current projects: e.g. Hoover Flat Reservoir, Gillem and other lakes in the Shapash project. And numerous examples of intermittent creeks so close to roads that riparian areas and increasingly-rare special-status species' habitats are cut during post-fire roadside salvage (not uncommonly with few to no riparian-specific marking guideline modifications or protections.) Also, many instances of ephemeral or intermittent creeks being captured by low-maintenance-level roads, resulting in both erosion and loss of riparian habitat. i thought decommissioning or re-routing roads was supposed to be part of Travel Management, but that was mostly a road inventory, often "blessing" many skid roads and even skid trails from previous logging... Thanks, Julie Rechtin - 5/3/2026

Less than 1% of users on the PNF are OHV. This is according to the PNF's own surveys. Why then the focus on new OHV development? Didn't we eliminate some 1,300 miles of OHV illegal trails in 2005? Why are we doing this again? Most users are hikers on the PNF. Let's do that. Please consider the results of your 2025 survey when they come out. Please develop trails accordingly. Thank you Lane P. Labbe' 3/15/2026.

I support this project to maintain and improve the trails and areas within g Plumas natl Forest. I am an avid hiker, Motorcycle and MTB user. Thanks! Alan - 3/27/2026

We have been Stakeholders with 4 mining claims within this location for close to a decade, and over the years, we have witnessed: * illegal OHV trails and hidden encampments for drug manufacturing, Claim Jumpers, historical artifact thieves, and other suspicious activity * Increase in erosion after increasingly damaging wildfires that are filling in Winters Creek, Feather River, and the surrounding natural springs * Deterioration of historical forest road access and sites that have been available for the public interest established in the 1800's * Senic trails that have now been littered with burnt tree carcases that are impassable for wildlife, hikers, and nature lovers. * reduction in the sightings of deer, bear, and several smaller mammals, and more. With this restoration project, OHVs will have a defined access management point that will reduce further destruction of natural resources and habitats, and will allow for access to stakeholders' locations for the removal of debris that has accumulated throughout the years due to forest fires and the blocking of access to historical landmarks and features of interest. In addition to opening up larger areas for new habitat and vegetation growth. This project, if funded, will allow for younger generations of volunteers to build lifelong skills that are necessary for future preservation and restoration of our natural resources. Darryl Crady - 4/16/2026

The OHV grant funding is needed for the continued support of the regional trail networks within Plumas County. The funding is necessary for trail maintenance, multi use recreational accessibility to our public lands, connectivity to towns in the region promoting business opportunities and economic growth, and outreach promoting environmental stewardship. Tim Boyer - 5/1/2026

Hill Hoppers club with the adopt a trail agreement for swamp OHV trail and Ershim lake cg need the following materials for maintenence and repairs… 15 gal of green paint for restrooms 5 gal of white for the inside, two 4”x8”x8’ beams four 2”x8”x8’ for bathrooms, 30 3/8x6” lag bolts and washers for restroom, 90 1/2x12” lag bolts and washers for tables, restroom chemicals, two 2.5 gal gas cans, 1 gal saw bar oil, 1 pack of two stroke gas mix, 250 trail marker signs and nails, 20pair leather gloves, 10 hard hats, 10 pair safety glasses, two pairs of chainsaw chaps, 4 new chainsaw chains 25 inch 3/8 x .050 full skip, two shovels, two hog hoe/pollasky, 1 McCloud, 2 hard rakes, 2 soft rakes. Bryce Anderson - 4/27/2026

(Ground Operations) The Stanislaus NF manages hundreds of miles of OHV routes on the forest that is enjoyed by tens of thousands of recreationists annually. This form of tourism has a considerable economic benefit on the small mountain towns in Calaveras, Alpine, Tulomune, and Mariposa counties. I support the continued use of state OHV funds so these OHV opportunities can continue to be enjoyed by the public. Evan - 4/3/2026

(Development) The Spicer Sno Park routinely gets over 200 vehicles visiting per day on weekends throughout the winter. Currently the Sno Park has one bathroom, which results in waiting lines of up to 20 minutes to use the toilet. Installing an additional bathroom is needed to provide this basic service that Sno Park users are paying for. Evan - 4/3/2026

(Restoration) Abundant trash dumping and illegal fire wood cutting is a problem on the Stanislaus NF that has gotten worse in recent years. These funds being used to confine vehicle use to legal travel routes will help to minimize this problem. I support the use of state OHV restoration funds on the Stanislaus NF. Evan - 4/3/2026

I fully support the Phase 2 East Zone connectivity grant. This grant will continue the work already started to increase the amount of motorized legal, multi-use single track in the Truckee area. There is a tremendous need in the area for more legal motorized trail. Frank Havlik - 3/11/2026

I am writing in full support of the East Zone Connectivity Project and the grant under consideration for Phase 2. Phase 1 of this project has been fantastic for the region and Phase 2 will build upon that success. I urge the grant review committee to approve this grant request. John Manocchio - 3/12/2026

I am greatly in support of expanding trails in the Tahoe National Forest. These trails are a great way for my friends and family to recreate and support local small businesses in the Tahoe and surrounding communities. These opportunities to increase riding areas for multi-use trails is a great use of the OHV funds and is what the funds were designed to be used for. Please grant for further development. Keith Collins - 3/12/2026

As a partner with the USFS Truckee Ranger District, we are writing in full support of the East Zone Connectivity Project and the grant under consideration for Phase 2. Phase 1 of this project has been fantastic for the region and Phase 2 will build upon that success. As a non-profit assisting with the development of this project, we urge the grant review committee to approve this grant request. Truckee Dirt Riders - 3/13/2026

As a resident of Truckee for over 25 years, I fully support the grant proposal for improving and expanding recreation opportunities for Dirt Biking. Currently, there are not enough miles of approved trail to support current use levels, resulting in networks of unauthorized routes. Unauthorized routes are causing resource damage to our forest and creating user conflicts among public land users. Bill Pindar - 3/15/2026

The East Zone Connectivity Project will be a valuable and popular addition to outdoor recreation opportunities in the region. The existing completed sections are extremely popular and well used. Riders are asking for more!! I've heard positive comments riders from as far away as Marysville, Sacramento, Napa, and the San Francisco Bay Area. Please keep up the good work! Erik Johnson - 3/15/2026

This is a great new section of trail. I fully support this project! Chris Bartkowski - 3/17/2026

I am writing in full support of the East Zone Connectivity Project and the grant under consideration for Phase 2. Phase 1 of this project has been fantastic for the region and Phase 2 will build upon that success. I urge the grant review committee to approve this grant request. Taylor Cranney - 3/19/2026

I am a member of Truckee Dirt Riders and I fully support the East Zone Connectivity project. I ride that area weekly during the riding season here in Truckee. I also volunteer to do trail work days through the club. Sincerely, Neil Rodriguez - 3/25/2026

Please keep this project going. It's such an amazing project for the community. The new trails are multi use and very good. I have seen more hikers and mtn bikers than dirt bike users. I ride dirt bikes and mountain bikes. The trails are bringing people up from Reno, Carson, and Sacramento/ Grass Valley. We should have some of the best riding in the country, thus far it's pretty limited. This will help the community and the outdoor community as a whole. Right now there are tons of unsanctioned trails, some that wouldn't conform to some standards. My hope is that if we have enough legal trails there will be less bootleg and unsanctioned trails. Many of the not sanctioned trails are very high quality and could also be included which would also bring costs done. I think some of the new trails has used parts of user created trails over the years. Jeremy Schneir - 3/26/2026

I am writing to express strong support for Phase 2 of the East Zone Connectivity Project on the Tahoe National Forest. This proposal represents a thoughtful, well-planned continuation of prior work that is already delivering meaningful benefits to the recreating public. The documented and growing demand for motorized single-track trail opportunities on the Truckee Ranger District makes this project both timely and necessary. Phase 1 has clearly demonstrated success, expanding access and creating high-quality riding experiences. However, as noted in the project description, limited connectivity continues to constrain the full potential of the Boca/Stampede trail system. The additional 6.3 miles proposed in Phase 2 will play a critical role in completing loop opportunities, improving trail flow, and reducing user congestion at existing access points. I also want to emphasize the unique value of high quality singletrack riding experiences for the dirt bike community. Well-designed singletrack trails provide a level of challenge, immersion, and connection to the landscape that cannot be replicated on wider roads or dispersed routes. For many riders, these trails are the reason we choose to recreate in areas like Tahoe National Forest — they offer a physically engaging, skill-building, and deeply rewarding outdoor experience. Expanding thoughtfully constructed singletrack opportunities not only meets demand but fosters a strong stewardship ethic among riders who value and care for these trails. Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship and Truckee Dirt Riders are incredible stewards of public lands and an asset to the National Forest districts they serve. Their management ensures that this project will be implemented to a high standard, with long-term sustainability in mind. This expansion project builds logically on prior investments, responds directly to public demand, and improves the functionality of an already popular trail system. I strongly encourage the agency to approve funding for Phase 2 of the East Zone Connectivity Project. Lacey Barnett - 3/26/2026

I support this project 100% and hope the state of California supports it as well. These are much needed trails in the area. The work SBTS and the Truckee ranger district are doing is amazing and i hope it continues to get fully supported. Adam Carpineta - 3/26/2026

I fully support this grant. I love the work that has already been done in the area. Jason Heath - 3/26/2026

Project should emphasize new construction to facilitate loops. Out/back trails invite user built connections. Updated maps of current trails are needed. Stu Wik - 3/26/2026

To the California OHV Program, As a resident and homeowner in the Glenshire neighborhood in Truckee and a member of the Truckee Dirt Riders, I am writing to strongly support the East Zone Connectivity Phase 2 project. Having volunteered on numerous trail-building days with the Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship and the USFS, and as a frequent user of these trails on dirt bikes, mountain bikes, and on-foot I have seen the immense value this project provides. This project is a vital investment for our community because: Connectivity: The 1.5-mile segment completing the loop on trail 17E48 is a great improvement, allowing riders to stay on trails rather than using Forest Service roads to return to the trailhead. The 4.8-mile northern extension provides legal trail access for visitors at Stampede Reservoir (Logger Campground), who currently have no legal way to ride from their campsites to the trail system. The ability to ride full loops without road sections breaking them up is a highly desired change in this trail system. Sustainability: By adding 6.3 miles of professionally designed, sustainable single-track to the existing trailset, the USFS can better manage the growing demand for motorized recreation via motorcycles and electric mountain bikes and reduce the impact of user-created trails. The more trails are available, the more spread out the use becomes, and the lesser the impact on the trailset. Community: This project is backed by a dedicated local volunteer base and supported by the community at large. We are committed to the long-term maintenance and stewardship of these trails to ensure they remain a high-quality resource for years to come. I urge you to fully fund this grant to help us complete this essential link in the Tahoe National Forest trail system as well as helping create the dream trail system via the connection with Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship's larger 'Connected Communities' master plan. Sincerely, Cory Maier Truckee (Glenshire) Resident and Member of Truckee Dirt Riders - 3/26/2026

Dear Review Committee, I am writing to express strong support for the proposed Phase 2 connectivity expansion of the public OHV trail system. This project represents a valuable investment in outdoor recreation, community connectivity, and responsible land use. By linking two existing trail systems with a designated route, Phase 2 will significantly enhance accessibility and create a more cohesive network for riders of all skill levels. This connectivity not only improves the user experience but also helps distribute traffic more evenly, reducing environmental impact on any single area. In addition, the expanded trail system is expected to bring economic benefits to the surrounding communities by attracting visitors, supporting local businesses, and encouraging tourism. Just as importantly, a well-planned and managed trail network promotes safe and sustainable recreation while fostering stewardship of public lands. I strongly encourage you to fund this important phase of the project. It is a forward-thinking effort that will deliver lasting recreational, environmental, and economic benefits. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Brian - 3/26/2026

I support funding for these projects to maintain and enhance the Public use in the Tahoe Natl Forest. Alan Walls - 3/27/2026

(Development East Zone Connectivity Phase 2) I support this request because it directly funds trail maintenance and the protection of natural resources, ensuring long-term recreational opportunities. Ethan Gibson - 3/31/2026

(Development Yuba Enhancement Rattlesnake 2) I support this request because it directly funds trail maintenance and the protection of natural resources, ensuring long-term recreational opportunities. Ethan Gibson - 3/31/2026

The Tahoe National Forest East Zone Connectivity Project has proven to be a real game changer for the designated OHV trail system on the Truckee Ranger district. Phase 1 has added over 14 miles of new trail and greatly improved almost 35 miles of existing trails. Phase 2 will continue the momentum by linking up existing routes in the Verdi Ridge area with new single track trail enabling a continuous trail riding opportunity. I encourage the funding of this grant request. It offers tangible value to OHV and other user groups while at the same time improving management objectives for recreation on Verdi Ridge. Thank You. Steve Davis - 3/31/2026

(Ground Operations) All of the equipment outlined in this proposal is needed. This is what our forest service working for us looks like. It all starts with ground operations. Jarrod Jacobi - 4/6/2026

(Development East Zone Connectivity phase 2) I fully support the East Zone Connectivity Phase 2 project. Looping unconnected trails together ultimately cuts down on illegal trail building activity. Plus, more trails is just better for obvious reasons. Jarrod Jacobi - 4/6/2026

Re: Development Phase 2 – East Zone Connectivity Project (OHV Grant Application) Dear OHMVR Division: We appreciate the opportunity to provide comments on the Development Phase 2 component of the East Zone Connectivity Project. We recognize the effort that has gone into advancing this proposal and the importance of recreation on public lands. However, we are concerned that the project, as proposed, may result in significant environmental impacts that have not been adequately evaluated and therefore warrant additional review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) prior to a decision to grant or deny funding by the Off-highway Motor Vehicle Recreation Division of the California Department of Parks and Recreation. 1. CEQA Legal Framework and OHMVR Obligations Require Full Evaluation of Foreseeable Significant Impacts As a state agency, the OHMVR Division has an obligation under CEQA to evaluate whether a project it funds may have significant environmental effects, including direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts.1 Indirect impacts include those that are reasonably foreseeable, while cumulative impacts reflect the incremental effects of a project when considered alongside past, present, and probable future actions.2 If there is substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before a lead agency, that a project may have a significant effect on the environment, the agency must prepare a draft Environmental Impact Statement. The East Zone Connectivity Project Phase 2,4 as a project under consideration for OHMVR funding, must comply with these requirements. Here, substantial evidence indicates that the project may result in the following significant impacts: (1) Indirect impacts to migratory corridors; (2) Cumulative impacts of past, ongoing, and reasonably foreseeable large-scale motorized trail expansion in the region; and (3) Cumulative and indirect impacts of existing high road densities and unmaintained infrastructure. Given these considerations, the OHMVR division must ensure that an environmental review fully evaluates these impacts and, where necessary, prepares an EIR to assess and mitigate them in compliance with CEQA. 2. Substantial Evidence Demonstrates That the Project May Significantly Impact Migratory Corridors and Wildlife Connectivity. The proposed project may result in significant impacts to wildlife movement and habitat connectivity, particularly within priority migratory corridors for mule deer. Under CEQA, impacts to wildlife movement, habitat connectivity, and sensitive ecological resources constitute significant environmental effects where there is substantial evidence that a project may disrupt ecological function or reduce habitat availability. CEQA Guidelines Appendix G (Biological Resources) specifically identifies as potentially significant any project that would “interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors.” A substantial body of scientific literature demonstrates that motorized recreation can displace wildlife from otherwise suitable habitat, alter movement behavior, and reduce the functional availability of habitat even in the absence of physical habitat loss. These effects are particularly pronounced for migratory and habitat-specialist species, which are less adaptable to disturbance and rely on spatially constrained movement pathways that have been established and reinforced over thousands of years. Research further shows that recreation can fragment habitat and exacerbate existing movement bottlenecks.8 For migratory ungulates, including mule deer, these disruptions can increase energetic costs, alter migration timing, and reduce the effectiveness of established corridors. In a technical report for the Forest Service, Miller et al. (2020) highlighted that “ATVs can cause vegetation and soil loss, shifts to nonnative plant communities, habitat fragmentation, disruption of migration corridors, and altered use of areas for breeding.” To mitigate these impacts, the report recommends the following: “[t]o the extent possible, large unfragmented areas should be maintained for species that rely on such territories and are sensitive to human visitors. Depending on the level of sensitivity of the species of concern, these areas should host limited or no recreation. Recreation and transportation routes should be planned to avoid areas important to migration and population connectivity.” These studies show that motorized recreation can act as a barrier to movement, even without physical habitat loss. Here, the proposed trail network overlaps with established mule deer migration corridors in the Northern Sierra that have been identified as critical conservation priorities under Secretarial Order 336212 and California’s associated Action Plan. The Action Plan uses GPS collar data to highlight the importance of seasonal migration for vulnerable mule deer herds and outlines strategies to restore and sustain both these populations and their habitat. These strategies are not conceptual. They are actively being implemented through substantial public and private investments across the region. For example, wildlife crossing improvements along Interstate 80,15 habitat protection and stewardship initiatives such as the Waší·šiw Land Trust acquisition of the Loyalton Ranch,16 and the U.S. 395 Wildlife Crossing and Corridor Restoration Project are all components of a landscape-scale effort to reconnect fragmented habitats and restore migratory pathways. Together, these investments reflect a clear, multi-partner commitment to maintaining the functional integrity of these corridors. Importantly, California’s Action Plan for Secretarial Order 3362 explicitly recognizes recreation as a potential threat to migratory behavior and recommends that siting of motorized vehicle activities be timed and managed to avoid or minimize impacts to migration corridors. Because the project introduces new motorized recreation within these mapped movement pathways, it falls squarely within the scope of Appendix G’s requirement to evaluate whether a project would substantially interfere with wildlife movement. Given the well-documented behavioral responses of wildlife to recreation disturbance, it is reasonably foreseeable that the project would reduce the functional effectiveness of these corridors. Extensive scientific evidence on recreation-related disturbance, combined with the State’s GPS collar data identifying priority migration corridors, provides substantial evidence that the project’s location may result in significant impacts to wildlife movement and habitat connectivity. Under CEQA, these impacts require full evaluation and cannot be dismissed through a categorical exemption. 3. The Project’s Impacts Are Cumulatively Considerable in the Context of the Connected Communities Trail Network. The project’s impacts are cumulatively considerable and therefore require full evaluation under CEQA. CEQA is intended to prevent the incremental degradation of environmental resources through piecemeal decision-making by requiring agencies to evaluate how individual projects contribute to broader patterns of development and environmental change. Agencies must evaluate cumulative impacts where a project’s incremental effects are “cumulatively considerable,” meaning that they are significant when viewed in connection with the effects of past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects. The statute and Guidelines emphasize that cumulative impacts arise from the combined effects of multiple projects, even where individual contributions may appear limited in isolation. Consistent with this principle, CEQA requires agencies to evaluate reasonably foreseeable future consequences of a project. Courts have made clear that an EIR must analyze the environmental effects of future expansion or related actions where (1) the future activity is a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the project; and (2) it is significant in that it may change the scope or nature of the project or its environmental effects. This standard reflects CEQA’s core principle that analysis of environmental impacts cannot be avoided by segmenting a larger project into smaller components, each considered in isolation. In applying this test, courts focus on whether there is substantial evidence in the record showing that future activity is likely to occur. As the Court emphasized in Laurel Heights in determining whether future activity is reasonably foreseeable,”[w]e need not delve into the . . . complex internal procedures to determine who has the power to decide precise uses of the building. . . It is the substance of the evidence, not the source alone, that matters.” In Laurel Heights, the court found that the University's stated intent to expand its use of a facility in response to public inquiry and projections of future occupancy made it “indisputable” that future expansion was reasonably foreseeable. As a result, the agency was required to evaluate those future impacts as part of the project’s environmental review. Here, the cumulative impacts of the 500-mile Connected Communities and its associated past, ongoing, and reasonably foreseeable future impacts should be assessed in the context of this project. This project and Claremont Trails, as well as previous phases of the project like East Zone Connectivity Phase 1, are segments of the 500-mile trail network, the planning of which was funded by the Sierra Nevada Conservancy and is actively implemented through phased development including a Master Challenge Cost Share Agreement with the Tahoe National Forest. Together with the map of other connected projects,30 these actions constitute substantial evidence of an ongoing and coordinated pattern of trail expansion across the region. Second, this expansion is significant because it will change both the scope and environmental effects of the project. While a single 6.4-mile segment may appear limited in isolation, the buildout of a 500-mile network fundamentally alters the scale of disturbance across the landscape— particularly where, as here, multiple trail segments are proposed within the same priority area for migratory corridors. As Laurel Heights makes clear, an agency cannot avoid analyzing these broader impacts simply because full buildout has not been formally approved; where the general type and extent of future activity are reasonably foreseeable, they must be evaluated. Prior environmental review for the East Zone Connectivity Project Phase 1 concludes that the project “is not expected to interfere with wildlife movement” and that new trails “are not expected to increase impacts to wildlife movement . . . compared to existing conditions,” based on the premise that the area consists of “large open space” with “abundant wildlife movement opportunities” This conclusion is fundamentally undermined by the broader context in which these projects are being advanced. The finding of “no increase in impact” is premised on evaluating each trail segment in isolation, without accounting for the cumulative effect of repeatedly approving additional trails and staging areas across the same landscape. Under this approach, each individual project is deemed “insignificant” while the State’s own recovery guidance for restoring these migratory corridors where these trails are sited say the opposite. In effect, the assumption that movement opportunities remain “abundant” is being used to justify continued expansion of trail infrastructure, while the incremental erosion of those opportunities is never evaluated. Accordingly, the repeated conclusion that individual trail segments will not “increase impacts” is not evidence of no impact, but rather evidence of a segmented analytical approach that fails to capture how these projects function collectively. When considered together alongside completed, ongoing, and reasonably foreseeable future trail segments the incremental expansion of motorized recreation infrastructure is reasonably expected to reduce habitat permeability and disrupt wildlife movement across the landscape. Because the Connected Communities network represents a reasonably foreseeable, actively implemented system of related projects, CEQA requires evaluation of its cumulative impacts. Limiting analysis to this segment alone would be inconsistent with CEQA’s requirements. Accordingly, OHMVR must assess the project’s contribution to the cumulative impacts of the broader network before approving funding or relying on a categorical exemption. 4. Expanding the Trail System Without Adequate Maintenance and Enforcement Will Result in Foreseeable Environmental Degradation CEQA requires agencies to evaluate reasonably foreseeable indirect and cumulative impacts. The CEQA Guidelines define indirect impacts as those that are “caused by the project and are later in time or farther removed in distance, but are still reasonably foreseeable.” Cumulative impacts are defined as “two or more individual effects which, when considered together, are considerable” or which “compound or increase other environmental impacts.” Additionally, CEQA requires that environmental analysis be grounded in existing physical conditions, which serve as the baseline for determining whether a project will have a significant effect. Here, the environmental setting includes documented constraints on the U.S. Forest Service’s ability to maintain and manage its existing trail system. A report prepared by the Government Accountability Office reviewing U.S. Forest Service’s trail maintenance activities found that the Forest Service currently has more miles of trail than it is able to maintain, “resulting in a persistent maintenance backlog with a range of negative effects.” These reports identify specific, recurring environmental impacts associated with this shortfall, including increased erosion and sediment delivery to streams from poorly maintained routes, proliferation of unauthorized user-created trails, damage to vegetation and soils, and degradation of wildlife habitat due to unmanaged motorized use. Officials from some forests have said that “conversion of hundreds or even thousands of miles of motor vehicle trails has added new maintenance challenges and strained already-limited budgets.” Moreover, unauthorized trails developed by motorized users is a persistent problem, which takes “time and resources away from maintaining system trails because officials must address safety and resource concerns associated with the trails.” In landscapes with high road and trail densities, these conditions contribute to effects that compound over time, as unmanaged routes expand, fragment habitat, and increase disturbance. Limited enforcement further allows illegal off-route use to persist, exacerbating environmental impacts and undermining the effectiveness of designated systems.41 These conditions are foreseeably intensified by recent workforce reductions at the U.S. Forest Service that will be tasked with long-term management of these networks. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management reports that 515 U.S. Forest Service employees in California alone left the agency in 2025, further constraining the agency’s ability to maintain and manage existing infrastructure. Where documented limitations in maintenance and enforcement capacity are likely to result in increased erosion, unauthorized use, and habitat degradation, those outcomes constitute foreseeable environmental effects that must be evaluated under CEQA. In this context, adding new motorized trails to an already overextended system makes it reasonably foreseeable that these well-documented impacts to national forest lands will intensify. Even if individual trail segments are designed to minimize impacts, the inability to adequately maintain and manage the broader network can result in cumulative environmental degradation across the landscape. Accordingly, CEQA requires evaluation of not only the direct impacts of trail construction, but also the reasonably foreseeable indirect and cumulative impacts that arise from expanding a system under these conditions. 5. CEQA Requires Comprehensive Environmental Review Before Advancing This Project For the reasons outlined above, there is substantial evidence that the proposed project may result in significant environmental impacts, including impacts to priority migratory corridors, cumulatively considerable effects associated with the broader Connected Communities trail network, and indirect impacts stemming from limited management capacity. Under CEQA, these circumstances require a higher level of environmental review and preclude reliance on a categorical exemption. This project cannot be meaningfully evaluated in isolation. It is part of a larger, state-funded and actively implemented system of motorized trail development that, when considered as a whole, poses a reasonably foreseeable risk of landscape-scale habitat fragmentation and disruption of wildlife movement. CEQA is designed to prevent precisely this type of incremental degradation by requiring disclosure and analysis of cumulative impacts before additional projects are approved. Accordingly, we respectfully request that OHMVR not approve funding for this project absent a thorough environmental review that fully evaluates its direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts. At a minimum, this review should:• Assess impacts to wildlife movement and priority migratory corridors; • Evaluate the cumulative effects of the broader Connected Communities trail network; • Analyze the environmental consequences of limited long-term management and enforcement capacity; and • Consider avoidance-based alternatives that would reduce or eliminate impacts to sensitive habitats. Taking these steps will ensure that recreation planning in this region proceeds in a manner that is consistent with CEQA’s requirements and aligned with the State’s broader investments in wildlife conservation and habitat connectivity. Thank you for your consideration. We welcome continued engagement to support a more comprehensive and sustainable approach to recreation planning in this landscape. Sincerely, Mari Galloway, Jeff Aardahl, Lisa Belenky, Ron Logan, and Elizabeth Ramsey - 5/4/2026

This request for funding should be approved. Inyo National Forest has experienced a huge increase in the numbers of people who recreate in Inyo and Mono counties and that trend it is going to continue. Most of these folks access the forest by vehicle. Public compliance with all forest laws and regulations ensures that we will have a beautiful and healthy forest to enjoy for years to come. Enforcement needs all the help it can get to properly patrol an area this size and this remote. The contacts I have had with their officers in the field have been great. Pat Woods - 5/3/2026

What an interesting project! One question, is this training voluntary or mandatory? If and when you do this training, I would very much like to witness it. I am an off road vehicle advocate in San Diego and would come out for a visit. I had the good opportunity to help Patricia Urena from El Centro with teaching kids to ride minibikes under NYPUM. There is a bill running in the State legislature right now to require training for all off road vehicle operators in California AB1897. Have a look. Best of luck and please let me know when you begin training. Ed Stovin - 4/27/2026

California State Parks Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation Division Sacramento, California Re: Letter of Support – City of Needles Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation Staging Area Project Dear California State Parks OHV Division: On behalf of Colorado River Medical Center, I am pleased to provide this letter of strong support for the City of Needles’ application to the California State Parks Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation (OHMVR) Division for development of an Off-Highway Motor Vehicle (OHV) Recreation Staging Area. As the sole acute care hospital serving Needles and the surrounding tri-state region, Colorado River Medical Center understands both the recreational value and the public safety responsibilities associated with OHV use in our community. Needles is uniquely positioned as a gateway to significant off-highway recreation areas that attract visitors from across California, Arizona, and Nevada. Establishing a designated, well-planned staging area will promote safer access, better organization of riders and equipment, and improved emergency response coordination. From a healthcare and public safety perspective, a formal staging area provides several important benefits: Improved Safety Infrastructure: Designated access points, clear signage, and organized parking reduce confusion and lower the risk of preventable injuries. Emergency Access and Coordination: A centralized staging location enhances response times for EMS and public safety agencies, including coordination with our emergency department. Community Health and Economic Stability: Outdoor recreation supports physical activity, tourism, and economic vitality—factors that contribute positively to community well-being and local healthcare sustainability. Education and Injury Prevention: The project creates opportunities for safety education, responsible riding outreach, and collaboration between the City, public safety agencies, and healthcare providers. Colorado River Medical Center supports investments that strengthen both the economic foundation and public safety infrastructure of our community. The proposed OHV staging area aligns with those goals and reflects thoughtful planning by the City of Needles to balance recreation, safety, and community health. We respectfully urge the California State Parks OHMVR Division to give favorable consideration to this grant application. This project represents a meaningful investment in safe recreation, regional tourism, and the long-term vitality of Needles. Bing Lum - 3/3/2026

As a resident who resides in the area of the proposed project, I am in full support of the project scope as prepared by the City of Needles. The existing parking lot is often utilized for OHV, which causes a lot of dirt in the neighbor. The pavement of the parking area is a significant improvement to the existing parking lot. The proposed project includes basic amenities like a restroom and trash disposal. I would only recommend that the City consider adding a picnic table or bench area for residents/visitors to utilize near the Kiosk area to learn more about the approved OHMV trails. Also, the Kiosk should include emergency response contact information, such as 911 and the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Office non-emergency number. Kathy Rockwood - 3/3/2026

Needles CA Off-Highway Motor Vehicle grant is important to helping us establish our area for off road enthusiasts to make us their destination for off road fun. The site should also include a few picnic tables to provide Visitors a place to enjoy our desert. Our location in the Mojave Desert offers views of the surrounding hills and trails to the Colorado River. We are fortunate to be located on RT66 and Interstate 40 for an economic factor for our City. The center will give Needles an edge to attract Families to visit us and enjoy our area. Mayor Janet Jernigan - 3/3/2026

I think this is a terrific idea, which could influence spending within the city and increase revenue for local businesses. My concerns are liability based on the city’s part. Suggest posting signs that inform the public that the parking area is at their own risk, that any damages or loss of property are not the responsibility of the City of Needles. Also warning signs that establish warnings that trail riding or hiking is a possibly dangerous activity that is taken at your own risk. Adding a covered or uncovered picnic table type area would be a good addition. Considerations should also be made for the added expense of maintaining this area. Thomas Torrance - 3/4/2026

Hello, As a longtime owner of several RVs and side by sides, my life has been surrounded by camping. I currently own a RV rental and mobile repair business in Mohave Valley, AZ. I absolutely have supported Needles, CA as a consumer for years. I have camped at Pirates Cove for over 20 years several times a year and Needles Marina. My whole family comes to Needles, CA and it is a big family, multiple times a year. My bank is Arrowhead Credit Union in Needles, CA. Recently, I am looking a property for low-income rentals in Needles, CA. I completely support this project and see value to both consumer and the City of Needles, CA. I know this would be well received by the community. I am especially interested in your ADA accessibility as my family members are disabled and have limited trailer parking access. I also gave you feedback on your ADA compliance request. Please consider LARGE trash cans in your budget as I always see Glamis struggle with trash cans. I would love to work with the City of Needles to offer services. Thank you. I will be praying for this as I know this would bless MANY. Anna M Ochoa - 3/14/2026

The City of Needles is a historic place and a hosts beautiful landscape and outdoor recreational area that is under utilized due to extreme heat...but for outdoor enthusiast it's a location to enjoy nature. This grant would offer all residents present and future an opportunity to establish growth in tourism and safety protocols. This would also allow the City to extend no residents an outdoor recreational area of off road touring and camping. I along with many residents support this application. Many residents are not computer literate and navigation to this area is a bit complex. I am certain you would receive more comments otherwise. I hope you grant the City these funds and invest our tax dollars into this good outdoors stewardship. Kindly, Grace and Gabriel Thornton - 3/27/2026

This is a really neat project. I hope it does what you intend it to do. It is a large amount of money, I hope the grant pool will allow it. Best of luck and I hope to come visit when it is done. Ed Stovin - 4/27/2026

I am happy to see this facility continues to operate. I see a high number of volunteer hour (1500). I know that facilities like this do get a lot of volunteers. Dads come out and help, etc. The application is for a lot of money considering you charge $40 per rider and you don't require a green/red sticker on the vehicles running there. I am curious if the track is run by the city of a contractor? Good luck with the operation and I hope to visit some time. Ed Stovin - 4/27/2026

Hello! ABSOLUTELLY NOT!! while this could be a good idea, California is infested with fraud, mismanagement, overtaxation, corruption, so no more money from taxpayers, instead you can cut in fraud and use that money for the above subject, thanks. Javier Santo - 3/17/2026

We are commenting on behalf of the San Diego Off Road Coalition. We appreciate ICSO applications to help the OHV areas in Imperial County. We also appreciate the reasonable hourly rates. We are not sure if the second safety and education application belongs there or under LE. Either way, keep up the good work. Ed Stovin - 4/27/2026

This request for funding should be approved. Inyo National Forest has experienced a huge increase in the numbers of people who recreate in Inyo and Mono counties and that trend it is going to continue. Most of these folks access the forest by vehicle. Public compliance with all forest laws and regulations ensures that we will have a beautiful and healthy forest to enjoy for years to come. Enforcement needs all the help it can get to properly patrol an area this size and this remote. The contacts I have had with their officers in the field have been great. Pat Woods - 5/3/2025

Public Comment – Support for Palmdale Station OHV Enforcement Grant I am a resident of the Four Points area within the Palmdale Station jurisdiction and I strongly support the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department application for OHV enforcement funding. As outlined in the application, all surrounding areas to Palmdale are private property and OHV operation is not legal in these areas. Despite this, illegal operation of side-by-sides, quads, and motorcycles on public roads, private property, and within equestrian communities has become a recurring issue. Significant portions of the Palmdale Station patrol area include equestrian neighborhoods. In these areas, unlawful OHV activity presents not only a quality-of-life issue but also a genuine public safety concern. Horses are easily spooked by high-speed OHV traffic, placing riders, children, pedestrians, motorists, and operators at risk of serious injury. The application accurately notes the size and complexity of the patrol area—approximately 800 square miles —with limited personnel dedicated specifically to OHV enforcement. In practice, this means enforcement presence is often intermittent in high-use areas where activity tends to concentrate during weekends and holidays. Based on firsthand observation, unlawful OHV use in certain communities is frequently carried out by repeat operators using the same machines and staging from predictable areas. Targeted, well-timed enforcement operations have the potential to significantly deter this behavior when resources are available. Additional funding that supports increased patrol frequency during peak usage periods, improved coordination with partner agencies, and continued public education efforts would directly benefit residents, protect private property, reduce conflict between motorized and non-motorized users, and mitigate environmental damage. I support this grant request and encourage consideration of expanded or sustained funding to address the scope and recurrence of illegal OHV activity within the Palmdale Station jurisdiction. Respectfully, Steven J. Hull Four Points Area Resident - 3/3/2026

We are commenting on behalf of the San Diego Off Road Coalition. These are good applications to keep order in OHV and non OHV areas. I do take exception to the very high hourly rates. Lancaster does not have that high of a cost of living. Please refer to Imperial Valley Sheriff's Department. Ed Stovin - 4/27/2026

The cost estimate appears to have omitted project costs for field work such as vehicle use/rental to provide access and transportation for required field work activities. Suggest updating the cost estimate to reflect this cost. Steve Cowdrey - 3/3/2026

We think this is a fantastic application to increase OHV access in the Sierra National Forest. We do think it is odd that the Madera County Sheriff is running the grant and not the Forest. We don't really care who runs it, as long as progress is made and we get more trails. Thank you Madera County Sheriff! Ed Stovin - 5/4/2026

I am pleased to offer wholehearted support for the Napa County Sheriff's Office application for OHV funds for a new side by side vehicle, equipment, and staff time to support their law enforcement work in the Knoxville OHV area. As one of the managers of the UC Davis McLaughlin Reserve, I have lived and worked in close proximity to he OHV area for 23 years.. During that time Knoxville has transformed from a lawless and vandalism-prone region to a clean and well-managed area for OHV recreation, that also is used by hikers, bicyclists, and academic researchers. This transformation has happened thanks to the consistent efforts of the NCSO and the BLM, but especially to the elevated law enforcement presence made possible by OHV grants. I won't reiterate what is already written in the grant application. It gives an accurate account of the positive effects the NCSO OHV program has had on public safety in the greater Knoxville region. With the recent explosion in popularity and development of side by side OHVs, it makes sense that the NCSO should switch from motorcycles to this safer type of vehicle. Paul Aigner - 3/5/2026

I encourage the OHMV program to support the Napa County Sheriff's Office's application to fund equipment needed to patrol and enforce safety in the Knoxville Recreation area (KRA). I am the resident director of the University of California's McLaughlin Natural Reserve, living and working onsite amidst the Knoxville Recreation Area. The KRA is a relatively remote area providing fantastic opportunities for the public to explore, enjoy, and understand California's wild lands, and is adjacent to the UC McLaughlin Reserve, which functions as an "outdoor laboratory" for University-level research and instruction. Unfortunately, historically the public lands in this area have also attracted members of the public who seek remote areas to conduct illegal and/or reckless activities, which can threaten the safety of the recreating public and people working on the Reserve, and damage University lands and infrastructure. I fully support the work done by the deputies from the Napa County Sheriff's department to ensure the safety and wellbeing of the KRA region. Prior to the NCS deputies increased activities in the area, the region had a reputation for being the lawless "wild west", a condition which increased patrolling by NCS office has greatly ameliorated, but a condition with is constantly changing as off-road vehicles and illegal/reckless interests evolve. A challenge faced by law enforcement is how to safely and effectively patrol the areas which the ill intended or law-unabiding public access. In order to be effective, the funding for equipment and manpower requested by NCSO is essential. I have supported the NCSO by providing access to University facilities for parking equipment, work breaks, and meetings. I am eager to do what I can to increase the legal and honest enjoyment of the public lands and safety for the entire community of this region, and encourage you to please do so as well by supporting the NCSO request for funds that will be very effective in increasing law enforcement and public safety. Sincerely, Catherine Koehler Resident Director University of California - Davis, McLaughlin Natural Reserve 26775 Morgan Valley Rd, Lower Lake, CA  - 3/6/2026

The Napa County Sheriff’s Office has been a huge assistance to myself and my place of work at the UC-Davis McLaughlin Natural Reserve. Reserve property shares borders with the Knoxville OHV area on multiples sides, so there is a significant need for Napa County Sheriff’s to be out patrolling to prevent trespass and keep the areas safe and lawful. I fully support their funding request for side by side (4x4) equipment that will help them operate more safely in the uneven terrain and poorly maintained roads. This funding will also allow for more patrol shifts, which is necessary as since the end of Covid restrictions there has been a noticeable increase in the use of the OHV areas and resulting problems from unsafe OHV use. The increased patrols on holiday weekends and the opening weekend of deer season is of particular importance to myself at the reserve, as it typically coincides with the most illegal activity i.e. poaching, fireworks, unsafe shooting of guns, etc. Napa County Sheriff’s Office presence during these times is very important to prevent unsafe or lawless behavior. Having Napa OHV Team in Knoxville more frequently makes myself and the reserve feel safer, and I am sure that transfers to all lawful OHV users as well. Benjamin Amann - 3/6/2026

The USFS is compromised by Sierra Buttes who directs these projects. The USFS has abdicated it's role to manage our local forests on the PNF. The trail systems developed at Mt. Hough violate several provisions of the Conservation and Open Space element of the Plumas County GP. Specifically provisions that provide for "adjacent communities" to public trails. The provisions require that adjacent communities and rural. agricultural areas are not subjected to "nuisances" created by these developments. The trails in the Mt. Hough system are designed for mountain bikers only. Other users are displaced. The trails are one way, downhill only trails that are dangerous for other users. Specifically hikers, trail runners and equestrians. These users would be at significant risk if encountering a mountain biker at high speeds. Local residents know to stay away from these trails. It's a shame. as these trails should be for all users. Unfortunately this is not the case. Lane Labbe' - 3/14/2026

Please fund the Plumas County's ground maintenance operations. These local trail systems are enjoyed by many locals and out of owners alike, and the system is an economic driver for the town of Quincy and others nearby. Especially after the DIxie Fire, maintenance is needed more than ever to keep the trails safe for users as burned trees continue to fall all over and brush grows at rapid rates. I love using this trail system myself and know many others who do so. It is becoming ever popular and maintenance is more important now than ever. Kyle Stone - 3/19/2026

Please fund Plumas County's Claremont Project development! This proposed project is so exciting and will be an incredible addition to and resource for the region. It will attract visitors and provide enjoyment and healthy activities for locals and outdoor enthusiasts, all user types. I will personally use this trail system often and know many others who will. This region needs this type of development to continue to thrive. Kyle Stone - 3/19/2026

Please continue to provide support for the Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship. The work they do brings enjoyment to myself and my family. The time of the trails has a significant impact on my experience every year when I travel to the area to ride and hike. I think the economic impact is important to the area. We need to be able to experience the beauty of these areas so we understand the need to protect them. If people do not have access they will not see the importance of their protection. Thank you for your consideration. Craig C Cameron - 3/19/2026

(Claremont Development) Please continue to provide support for the Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship. The work they do brings enjoyment to myself and my family. The time of the trails has a significant impact on my experience every year when I travel to the area to ride and hike. I think the economic impact is important to the area. We need to be able to experience the beauty of these areas so we understand the need to protect them. If people do not have access they will not see the importance of their protection. Thank you for your consideration. Craig C Cameron - 3/19/2026

(PNF Ground Operations) Please continue to provide support for the Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship. The work they do brings enjoyment to myself and my family. The time of the trails has a significant impact on my experience every year when I travel to the area to ride and hike. I think the economic impact is important to the area. We need to be able to experience the beauty of these areas so we understand the need to protect them. If people do not have access they will not see the importance of their protection. Thank you for your consideration. Craig C Cameron - 3/19/2026

These trails are an important part of Plumas County. I personally hike the trails at least twice a week and send our guests to the trails for a local hike. I see families out on the trails with their kids in tow, dogs in tow, and seniors like myself, bikers, and horses too. It is such a wonderful and needed asset to our community, and our health. Shelly L Hunter - 3/20/2026

I support the Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship in their works to maintain the trails to connect the communities in Plumas County. Great job that they do to maintain recreational trails in Plumas County. Jeff Titcomb - 3/26/2026

I support this grant. More trails will enhance public use of the land. As an avid OHV, hiker and MTB, this provides more recreation opportunities and will encourage visitors to help the economy in the region. Alan Walls - 3/28/2026

I support this grant. As an OHV user, the ground operation grant will keep the trail open, maintain the trails and provide access and recreation to many user groups that will have a positive impact on the local economy. Alan Walls - 3/28/2026

(Claremont Development) trial maintenance and log outs are necessary for safety! Partnership SBTS is great because SBTS does an amazing job. Maia Averett - 3/31/2026

(PNF Ground Operations) trial maintenance and log outs are necessary for safety! Partnership SBTS is great because SBTS does an amazing job. Maia Averett - 3/31/2026

Stoked to have more trails in Quincy! I've lived here for 15 years and the only thing keeping this community alive is mountain biking. Trails help our small businesses, restaurants, and hotels. They bring people to the area to spend money, and is a helpful resource for recruiting employees. More trails on Claremont means more room for trail users to spread out, and helps make Quincy a mountain biking destination, benefiting the economy and quality of life for everyone. Gina - 3/31/2026

(Claremont Development) To whom it may concern, We live in Quincy and enjoy our trail systems on a regular basis. Not only does it provide for a great outdoor experience where we live, it also brings visitors to Plumas County which helps with economic development. For this reason, we fully support the Claremont Development project and further support CA OHV funding for this project. Martin Scheel - 4/1/2026

(PNF Ground Operations) To whom it may concern, We live in Quincy and enjoy our trail systems on a regular basis. Not only does it provide for a great outdoor experience where we live, it also brings visitors to Plumas County which helps with economic development. For this reason, we fully support the continued PNF Ground Operations and funding. Please approve CA OHV funding for this project. Martin Scheel - 4/1/2026

Huge amount of maintenance required to maintain world class trails. The Dixie fire killed a lot of trees on Mt.Hough. Dead windfall blocks the trails after every storm cycle or wind event. SBTS is constantly clearing these trees. Also, the white thorn is encroaching more every year. Please fund this work. Stu Wik - 4/2/2026

I support funding Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship for maintaining trail systems in the Lost Sierra for Downieville, Mt. Hough, and Connected Communities. I have been riding the trails on mountain bikes for decades. So long that I now ride them with my kids. These trails provide world class destination level riding opportunities for locals and bring in people from the Bay Area and other states who spend money which helps the local economies. Fund Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship is really a no brainer. They are a professional non-profit outfit that has a dedicated crew and decades of experience building an maintaining trails. Steve Stewart - 4/2/2026

Please continue to fund the Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship projects. They do fantastic work maintaining access to our public lands, many of which have the rare fortune of not being significantly impacted by fire. As and active mountain biker, dirt bike rider, and overlander, keeping these trails maintained enables myself, my family, and our friends to access and care for the incredible Sierra Buttes area. Mick Waligorski - 4/2/2026

(Claremont Development) Please consider grant funding to the Plumas County operations led by the Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship. Trail maintenance includes logging out downed trees, cutting brush and improving sight lines, fixing tread and improving turns, and building and maintaining armored creek crossings. This includes trails that were burned over in the Dixie Fire that require extra attention to remove hazardous trees and cut back on rapid brush regrowth. The SBTS who build and maintain the trails in the area do so in a way that keeps them safe and sustainable for all to enjoy. This network of trails attracts people from all over the country to recreate and spend money locally, which in turn supports the local economy and provides more opportunities for jobs. Please continue to provide grant funding to this amazing organization! Ryan Taggart - 4/4/2026

(PNF Ground Operations) Please consider grant funding to the Plumas County operations led by the Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship. Trail maintenance includes logging out downed trees, cutting brush and improving sight lines, fixing tread and improving turns, and building and maintaining armored creek crossings. This includes trails that were burned over in the Dixie Fire that require extra attention to remove hazardous trees and cut back on rapid brush regrowth. The SBTS who build and maintain the trails in the area do so in a way that keeps them safe and sustainable for all to enjoy. This network of trails attracts people from all over the country to recreate and spend money locally, which in turn supports the local economy and provides more opportunities for jobs. Please continue to provide grant funding to this amazing organization! Ryan Taggart - 4/4/2026

Trails are an added value for our community and would welcome the economic and co mural beifits they bring. Matthew Meyerl - 4/11/2026

(Claremont Development) As an outdoor enthusiast, I am interested in maintaining access and opportunity to enjoy some of the most beautiful landscapes in California. It is imperative to maintain and preserve this access for ourselves and our children to continue to enjoy this land. This investment will provide much-needed funds and resources to the area around here to encourage more of us to get out and experience some of what makes our state so amazing. Greg Engemann - 5/1/2026

(Claremont Development) I would like to encourage awarding grant funding to this particular trail maintenance project. I have had the wonderful experience of riding this connecting trail from the valley floor in Quincy, over Mt Hough to Taylorsville along with approx 20 other riders from our off road motorcycle club - Nevada County Woods Riders. What makes this trail system special is its accessibility: you can get fuel, meals and lodging on either end with nothing but great trail and amazing views in between, making it a fantastic weekend destination for off road recreation. Laura Christofk - 5/1/2026

Let me start by saying California is blessed to have some of the most beautiful public lands in the country. OHV trails provide an opportunity for more people to experience this land, and the funds that go into maintenance ensure future riders will continue to have the opportunity to see these lands for generations to come. If we fail to maintain the trails, erosion and exploitation will change the landscape to the point of preventing future access for the next generation. It is our responsibility to keep our lands maintained and accessible for all to use. Greg Engemann - 5/1/2026

(PNF Ground Operations) I support the funding of this trail maintenance endeavor. The trails that are apart of this proposal allow access/exploration to many small towns along its access points. The better maintained and developed these trail systems are the more OHV enthusiast will frequent them and consequently contribute to the economy of these remote and often historic relics (towns). Win-win. Laura Christofk - 5/1/2026

To whom it may concern, please support Plumas County with grant money to support trail maintenance and access to beautiful Mt Hough. This is a premier destination for off highway recreation enthusiasts. Riders provide an income stream to local shops and restaurants. Brian Fiala - 5/2/2026

(Claremont Development) Recreational opportunities for visitors and locals. Creating local employment. Creating sustainable trail systems that require less maintenance. Keeping trails open and safe while protecting watersheds. Jeremiah Haverfield - 5/3/2026

(PNF Ground Operations) Recreational opportunities for visitors and locals. Creating local employment. Creating sustainable trail systems that require less maintenance. Keeping trails open and safe while protecting watersheds. Jeremiah Haverfield - 5/3/2026

(PNF Ground Operations) I support this grant and the Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship. The Plumas County trail system is a terrific public community resource. Spencer Smith - 5/3/2026

(Claremont Development) I support this grant and the Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship. The Plumas County trail system is a terrific public community resource. Spencer Smith - 5/3/2026

Thanks for allowing us to comment. Aubrey Lane Pickerell - 5/4/2026

May 4, 2026 California State Parks Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation Grants Program cc: Plumas County Planning Director, Tracy Ferguson Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship Director of Grant Management, Michelle Abramson Plumas National Forest Supervisor, Laura Schweitzer RE: Claremont Phase 1 Development OHV Grant Proposal For fifty years Friends of Plumas Wildernesses (FOPW) has been dedicated to studying, exploring, and safeguarding natural ecosystems where the Sierra and Cascades meet through conservation, advocacy, stewardship, and collaboration. The California Native Plant Society (CNPS) is a non-profit environmental organization with over 12,500 members in 36 Chapters across California and Baja California, Mexico. CNPS’s mission is to protect California’s native plant heritage and preserve it for future generations through the application of science, research, education, and conservation. We work closely with decision-makers, scientists, and local planners to advocate for well-informed policies, regulations, and land management practices. The Wildlands Network (WN) is a non-profit organization that works across North America to reconnect, restore, and rewild North America, so that life, in all of its diversity, can thrive. Our organizations acknowledge that motorized recreation is an appropriate use of our multiple-use public lands if it does not adversely impact natural and cultural resources or other established uses. FOPW has worked with the Plumas National Forest (PNF) and Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship (SBTS) to build trails in an environmentally considerate, long-term sustainable fashion. We greatly appreciate that the trail segment on the previous map within Critical Habitat of the federally Endangered Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog is no longer part of this project, and that SBTS has worked with FOPW in the past to improve the proposed Claremont Trail System. It is with that intent that we submit these comments. Based on the best currently available information, our organizations do not believe that the trail alignment identified for Claremont Phase 1 avoided any impact on resources or complies with Minimization Criteria required for Off-Road Vehicle use on federal public lands. The map titled Claremont Proposed Trails For Development clearly shows the route overlaps with several populations of two known rare plant species. This information is readily available to the public on the California Natural Diversity Database (https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB). Our Concerns: Phase 1 Trail Segments ? The proposed alignment intersects with the following known locations of rare plants. ? Lupinus dalesiae, 3 populations, Rare Plant Rank 4.2 ? Monardella follettii, 1 population, Rare Plant Rank 1B.2 Phase 2 Trail Segments The proposed alignment intersects with the following known locations of rare plants. Lupinus dalesiae, 5 populations, Rare Plant Rank 4.2 Sedum paradisum ssp. Subroseum, 1 population, Rare Plant Rank 1B.2 Our Recommendations: To comply with Minimization Criteria we recommend: ? Any portion of the proposed Claremont trail alignment within known populations of rare plants utilize existing roads where rare plants are known to occur or be realigned so the route does not overlap with known populations of rare plants. We appreciate adjustments made so far, especially removal of the segment in critical habitat of Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog. However, we believe there are more adjustments that could be made to better balance recreation with conservation of special status species, and minimize ground disturbance and maintenance requirements on our precious public lands. We expect that motorized trail funders and developers will respect legal requirements and Forest Service policy by realigning trail segments to avoid known populations of rare plants. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Claremont Phase 1 Development grant proposal. Sincerely, Ron Logan Board President Friends of Plumas Wilderness PO Box 1441 Quincy, CA 95971 Mari Galloway California Program Director Wildlands Network. Aubrey Lane Pickerell - 5/4/2026

California State Parks Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation Grants Program cc: Plumas County Planning Director, Tracy Ferguson Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship Director of Grant Management, Michelle Abramson Plumas National Forest Supervisor, Laura Schweitzer RE: Claremont Phase 1 Development OHV Grant Proposal For fifty years Friends of Plumas Wildernesses (FOPW) has been dedicated to studying, exploring, and safeguarding natural ecosystems where the Sierra and Cascades meet through conservation, advocacy, stewardship, and collaboration. The California Native Plant Society (CNPS) is a non-profit environmental organization with over 12,500 members in 36 Chapters across California and Baja California, Mexico. CNPS’s mission is to protect California’s native plant heritage and preserve it for future generations through the application of science, research, education, and conservation. We work closely with decision-makers, scientists, and local planners to advocate for well-informed policies, regulations, and land management practices. The Wildlands Network (WN) is a non-profit organization that works across North America to reconnect, restore, and rewild North America, so that life, in all of its diversity, can thrive. Our organizations acknowledge that motorized recreation is an appropriate use of our multiple-use public lands if it does not adversely impact natural and cultural resources or other established uses. FOPW has worked with the Plumas National Forest (PNF) and Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship (SBTS) to build trails in an environmentally considerate, long-term sustainable fashion. We greatly appreciate that the trail segment on the previous map within Critical Habitat of the federally Endangered Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog is no longer part of this project, and that SBTS has worked with FOPW in the past to improve the proposed Claremont Trail System. It is with that intent that we submit these comments. Based on the best currently available information, our organizations do not believe that the trail alignment identified for Claremont Phase 1 avoided any impact on resources or complies with Minimization Criteria required for Off-Road Vehicle use on federal public lands. The map titled Claremont Proposed Trails For Development clearly shows the route overlaps with several populations of two known rare plant species. This information is readily available to the public on the California Natural Diversity Database (https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB). Our Concerns: Phase 1 Trail Segments ? The proposed alignment intersects with the following known locations of rare plants. ? Lupinus dalesiae, 3 populations, Rare Plant Rank 4.2 ? Monardella follettii, 1 population, Rare Plant Rank 1B.2 Phase 2 Trail Segments The proposed alignment intersects with the following known locations of rare plants. Lupinus dalesiae, 5 populations, Rare Plant Rank 4.2 Sedum paradisum ssp. Subroseum, 1 population, Rare Plant Rank 1B.2 Our Recommendations: To comply with Minimization Criteria we recommend: ? Any portion of the proposed Claremont trail alignment within known populations of rare plants utilize existing roads where rare plants are known to occur or be realigned so the route does not overlap with known populations of rare plants. We appreciate adjustments made so far, especially removal of the segment in critical habitat of Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog. However, we believe there are more adjustments that could be made to better balance recreation with conservation of special status species, and minimize ground disturbance and maintenance requirements on our precious public lands. We expect that motorized trail funders and developers will respect legal requirements and Forest Service policy by realigning trail segments to avoid known populations of rare plants. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Claremont Phase 1 Development grant proposal. Sincerely, Ron Logan Board President Friends of Plumas Wilderness PO Box 1441 Quincy, CA 95971 Mari Galloway California Program Director Wildlands Network.

Friends of the High Lakes supports this grant. These funds would help finish the minimum work needed in the stream crossings to insure Open trails. These spots are the priority spots, and cannot really be done by just a volunteer effort alone - they need a project. The High Lakes was fairly stable until they were impacted heavily by the Dixie fire in 2021. Lack of foliage has resulted in more wet areas. We have to address these specific spots to meet State water quality laws. Nick Repanich - President - FOTHL - 4/23/2026

The needed repairs to the Pilot Creek OHV Area trails on 2N14 are very important for riders from miles around since it is one of only a few in the area. Allowing the first few miles to be impassable causes issues to worsen because riders seek to create user trails to get around obstacles. By making major improvements at the two failing sites, the rest of the area will have access for the intended OHV use and be improved so only minor maintenance will be needed over time. Also, improving the trail tread on the entire length of road will afford a more enjoyable OHV experience. The improved signage is welcome by everyone to clearly mark the various levels of OHV use and avoid conflict with private property owners and to protect the streams from erosion. Trinity County RCD is highly qualified in carrying out this project with timely and high quality results. Karen Wilson - 4/16/2026

Since there are no legal OHV trails in the Weaver Basin Trail System, in the Weaverville Community Forest, this grant would provide the long-needed opportunity to provide staff and contracts to write a plan to identify possible OHV use impacts and of restoration efforts on illegal OHV trails. There is a great need in this spot. It is good to see that the contractor would assure environmental compliance and that the public would be asked to help with the planning. The possible area that has been identified because of it's current illegal use with the nickname Spaghetti Bowl, located near Weaver Bally Road (on USFS land) seems to be the best choice. The planning process will confirm that and enable the next steps to go forward. The Trinity County RCD is dependable for following through so that riders have a fun, challenging, and legal area of trails in the Weaverville Community Forest and the needed restoration can be planned. Karen Wilson - 4/27/2026

I am a long-time frequent dirt biker on the OHV trails of the Los Padres National Forest. I am also an active trail maintenance volunteer in the Pozo OHV area. I’ve seen firsthand the deleterious effects the Gifford Fire has had on the Pozo OHV and surrounding area, as well as the limited resources the Los Padres National Forest has to perform the necessary repairs and maintenance. Many miles of trails have been impacted due to fuel break dozer lines and are now highly susceptible to erosion until the necessary drainage items (rolling dips, water bars, cross slope corrections, etc.) can be correctly restored. CCRTA has been instrumental in the repairs of the Pozo OHV area in 2025 and into 2026. Continued maintenance and repairs will be needed in 2027 and this grant will help to support the continued restoration of this area. Grants like these are critical in this post-fire recovery period to ensure that maintenance items and drainage improvements are performed timely to keep our trails in a sustainable state. Zach Teske - 3/9/2026

All I can say is keep up the great work. I hope to ride your trails sometime. Ed Stovin - 4/27/2026

This is a great group of grants that support a much loved area (and nearby for restoration) Good luck with the safety video, please let me be a tester by taking the training as it is developed. I would be happy to help or review training content as well. These are large grants, but worth funding. Ed Stovin - 4/27/2026

We love the ground operations and Owlshead grants. I personally use Owlshead and love how when you touch a route, it's identification comes up. Keep up the good work and let me know if you need help with another poker run. Ed Stovin - 4/27/2026

I am writing in strong support of the Friends of the Bridgeport Avalanche Center’s 2026 General Application. As a direct participant in FoBAC’s avalanche education programming, I have personally experienced the professionalism, structure, and integrity with which this organization operates. Their programs are not informal or casual efforts — they are highly organized, professionally delivered, and built on established avalanche education standards. The administrative strength reflected in this application mirrors what I observed in the field. FoBAC demonstrates strong partnerships with the U.S. Forest Service and other agencies, clear organizational structure, and responsible fiscal management. Their coordination, communication, and consistency are evident both operationally and educationally. The Bridgeport Winter Recreation Area is the only congressionally designated winter OHV recreation area in the United States. Managing safety in such a unique and heavily used area requires a capable, organized nonprofit partner. FoBAC has proven they are exactly that. Their compliance documentation, nonprofit verification, land manager coordination, and formal partnerships reflect a mature organization capable of responsibly stewarding public funding. Based on my experience and observation, they operate with transparency, accountability, and a clear public service mission. I strongly support approval of this application. Respectfully, Sean Thomason - 3/3/2026

I am writing in strong support of the Friends of the Bridgeport Avalanche Center’s Education & Safety Project for the 2026 grant cycle. I have personally attended FoBAC’s avalanche rescue course with my wife and have directly experienced the quality and impact of their programming. The one-day Companion Rescue course was hands-on, structured, and professionally delivered by instructors Andy and Kate. They were patient, clear, and exceptionally effective communicators. The training included extensive hands-on work with beacon searches, probing techniques, and strategic shoveling. The field scenarios were realistic and physically demanding — which is exactly what builds competence and confidence. The repetition and structured feedback significantly improved our efficiency and teamwork during simulated rescue situations. One of the most valuable components of the course was the “Daily Flow” framework. This structured risk-management system provides a step-by-step approach to anticipating conditions, assessing terrain, managing group dynamics, and making disciplined decisions before and during a ride. It is a practical decision-making tool that stays with you long after the course ends. I actively apply that framework in my own backcountry travel. FoBAC’s programming goes far beyond a basic safety talk. It combines forecasting, field observations, direct outreach at trailheads, structured education, and digital communication. Riders are exposed to safety messaging before their ride (forecasts), during their ride (trailhead engagement), and after their ride (conditions observations and debrief). As winter OHV participation continues to grow, structured and professional avalanche education is critical. Winter motorized users represent a significant percentage of avalanche fatalities nationwide. FoBAC directly addresses this through measurable education, consistent messaging, and field presence. This project enhances public safety, protects access to designated OHV areas, reduces user conflict, and promotes responsible recreation in avalanche terrain. Based on my direct experience in their programming, I can confidently say the outcomes are real, practical, and impactful. I strongly encourage approval of this grant request. Respectfully, Sean Thomason - 3/3/2026

Now more than ever we need the work from the ESAC organization to help OHV users make safe choices about backcountry access and recreation during winter. After a heartbreaking season of fatalities, the work they do helps prevent accidents. Please help us use our public lands safely! George Baker - 3/11/2026

Now more than ever we need the work from the ESAC organization to help OHV users make safe choices about backcountry access and recreation during winter. After a heartbreaking season of fatalities, the work they do helps prevent accidents. George Baker - 3/11/2026

I really value the information and Friends of Esac provides to me through their website and programs. I support their organization and would like this grant to be funded. Ea Tanton - 3/19/2026

I have attended ESAC educational programs with my family. They are good educational programs and I think they offer value to me and my family. Please continue to support ESAC through their grant application. Phil Tanton - 3/19/2026

Avalanche safety and education are the biggest components to the increase of alpine recreation that we have seen over the past few years. People are getting after it, but they need to be educated. In bounds and out. The avalanche centers are incredible and invaluable resources. They quite literary save our lives on a daily basis. They deserve every bit of funding available to them. Help us keep our friends and peers alive in the mountains!! Nash Mader - 3/20/2026

(General Application) Please continue to support ESAC. The work they perform is critical to keeping our back country community safe. William Honnef - 4/2/2026

(Education and Safety) Please continue to support ESAC. The work they perform is critical to keeping out back country community safe. William Honnef - 4/2/2026

Please provide financial support to the friends of eastern Sierra avalanche organization. They provide a valuable service to winter enthusiast and backcountry, skiers and snowmobile the builders with their timely and valuable snowpack information and Avalanche risk assessment. They are saving lives. Thank you. Eric Comer - 4/3/2026

I feel strongly that ESAC is deserving of continued support through OHV funding, as they provide an invaluable resource for many user groups in traveling through avalanche terrain in the winter. Please continue to fund these professionals as they continue to save lives through outreach and education. Ryan Huetter - 4/3/2026

(Education and Safety) I strongly support this grant proposal from Friends of the Eastern Sierra Avalanche Center. ESAC provides essential guidance and education to the many locals and visitors who recreate in the Eastern Sierra. Their daily advisories are specifically designed to reach OHV users in the Eastern Sierra and are of immeasurable value. Noé Barrell - 4/7/2026

I strongly support this grant proposal from Friends of the Eastern Sierra Avalanche Center. ESAC provides essential guidance and education to the many locals and visitors who recreate in the Eastern Sierra. Their daily advisories are specifically designed to reach OHV users in the Eastern Sierra and are of immeasurable value. Noé Barrell - 4/7/2026

Dear Committee, As professors and researchers in the Department of Wildlife at Cal Poly Humboldt, we are writing to provide support for the proposed Impacts of off-highway vehicle use on coastal wildlife project submitted to your Request For Proposals by the Institute of Wildlife Studies (IWS). This project addresses important conservation, management, and recreational research questions using a scientific approach to methods and analyses. Our Department has collaborated with IWS on numerous research and educational projects across faculty, graduate, and undergraduate students and these collaborations have resulted in publications, technical reports, and graduate theses. This project would provide research and educational opportunities for our students, and we confirm our commitment to being an active partner on this project. Sincerely, Barbara Clucas, PhD (Associate Professor and Department Chair, Department of Wildlife) and Micaela Gunther, PhD (Professor, Departmemt of Wildlife) - 3/3/2026

Any projects involving SBTS is a non-starter. SBTS is not a trail stewardship, they are a mountain biking club singularly focused on developing and maintaining downhill only race track type trails which displace all other users. They are in business to make profits for their Yuba Expedition sister company. There are many examples of altruistic Trail Stewardships doing the right thing for the public at large. Carson Valley Trail Stewardship is a great example. Look them up. See how they operate, and how inclusive they are. Sierra Buttes actively discourages non-mountain bike users from the trails the PNF let them develop. These are public lands, not private lands. The PNF recently conducted their bi-annual survey on the PNF. Let's see the results. Then let's focus on trail systems for ALL OF US, not one special interest group. Lane P. Labbe' - 3/15/2026

Please fund the Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship's ground maintenance operations in Downieville. SBTS does so much in this area and engages so many volunteers to keep this trail system in pristine condition. This is a world class trail system that is heavily trafficked by types of users. I love using this trail system myself and maintenance is critical to keep it open and safe for users. This trail system is also the largest economic driver in the region for the small, rural towns nearby. Kyle Stone - 3/19/2026

Please continue to provide support for the Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship. The work they do brings enjoyment to myself and my family. The time of the trails has a significant impact on my experience every year when I travel to the area to ride and hike. I think the economic impact is important to the area. We need to be able to experience the beauty of these areas so we understand the need to protect them. If people do not have access they will not see the importance of their protection. Thank you for your consideration. Craig C Cameron - 3/19/2026

Please continue to provide support for the Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship. The work they do brings enjoyment to myself and my family. The time of the trails has a significant impact on my experience every year when I travel to the area to ride and hike. I think the economic impact is important to the area. We need to be able to experience the beauty of these areas so we understand the need to protect them. If people do not have access they will not see the importance of their protection. Thank you for your consideration. Craig C Cameron - 3/19/2026

I support this grant and as an active member of Nevada County Woods rider, will continue to do volunteer trail days in support. SBTS is an amazing organization and has done so much for the community and environment. This area is a wonderful place to recreate and enjoy the nature. Many users groups benefit from these grants. Respectfully, Alan Walls - 3/27/2026.

(General Application Requirements) Creates sustainable trail systems that require less maintenance, and keeps trails open and safe while protecting watershed! SO important for our community. Maia Averett - 3/31/2026

(General Application Requirements) Sustainable trail systems are needed for community enjoyment! SBTS does an amazing job. Maia Averett - 3/31/2026

(Ground Operations) Sustainable trail systems are needed for community enjoyment! SBTS does an amazing job. Maia Averett - 3/31/2026

To whom it may concern, My family and I visit and use the trails system on a regular basis. It is gem to have such a wonderful trail system so close to home. These trails are also a financial lifeline to the area helping support local businesses. For this reason, we fully support the Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship's(SBTS) mission to keep these trails open, fun and safe for all to use. Please approve the OHV ground operations grant to assist the SBTS in their mission. Martin Scheel - 4/1/2026

The economic benefit of continuing to build and maintain trails in Downieville and the surrounding areas is invaluable. It brings in people who would not normally visit the area, encouraging them to explore not only the trails but also what local vendors have to offer—hotels, golf courses, other outdoor recreation such as state parks, food, and more. The joy these trails bring to me and many others who travel long distances to visit is significant. I’m excited to see them continue to grow. It’s such an exciting place to visit, and the Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship is making it more accessible. The trails they build are well designed for long-term enjoyment with minimal maintenance. The less maintenance required, the lower the potential for erosion issues, which benefits the watershed. They have years of experience doing this right. Yanik Zuluaga - 4/2/2026

More moto single track in the lost Sierra. Yes please! Stu Wik - 4/2/2026

I ride the mountain bike trails and ohv trails in the Sierra Buttes/Downieville area a few times a year. Since I have been riding in this area for several decades, I have noticed the fantastic trail maintenance and new trails that SBTS has done in this area. the wonderful wilderness and great trails bring me back here several times a year. I usually stay in Downieville, and also eat in Downieville and the surrounding cities, so I believe that visitors like me bring a beneficial economic benefit to the community. I hope that you will approve their grant so that me and others can continue to enjoy the trails, the community and the natural beauty that SBST helps provide! Dan Merrick - 4/2/2026

I support funding Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship for maintaining trail systems in the Lost Sierra for Downieville, Mt. Hough, and Connected Communities. I have been riding the trails on mountain bikes for decades. So long that I now ride them with my kids. These trails provide world class destination level riding opportunities for locals and bring in people from the Bay Area and other states who spend money which helps the local economies. Fund Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship is really a no brainer. They are a professional non-profit outfit that has a dedicated crew and decades of experience building an maintaining trails. Steve Stewart - 4/2/2026

(General Application) Please continue to fund the Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship projects. They do fantastic work maintaining access to our public lands, many of which have the rare fortune of not being significantly impacted by fire. As and active mountain biker, dirt bike rider, and overlander, keeping these trails maintained enables myself, my family, and our friends to access and care for the incredible Sierra Buttes area. Brian Hudson - 4/2/2026

Please continue to fund the Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship projects. They do fantastic work maintaining access to our public lands, many of which have the rare fortune of not being significantly impacted by fire. As and active mountain biker, dirt bike rider, and overlander, keeping these trails maintained enables myself, my family, and our friends to access and care for the incredible Sierra Buttes area. Brian Hudson - 4/2/2026

The Downieville trail system is extremely important to my family and friends. We travel to the area multiple times a year, bringing people back and new faces who have never experieneced the area. The SBTS who build and maintain the trails in the area do so in a way that keeps them safe and sustainable for all to enjoy. This network of trails attracts people from all over the country to recreate and spend money locally, which in turn supports the local economy and provides more opportunities for jobs. Please continue to provide grant funding to this amazing organization! Ryan Taggart - 4/4/2026

Please continue to support this project. It's critical to help small businesses in the region. Jim Lewis - 5/1/2026

I support the funding of the Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship request for ground operations to support the 129 miles of trails in the Downieville area. Frank Havlik - 5/1/2026

Using OHV grant funds for single track that is truly multi-use is a great thing. Make sure all signage communicates that these trails are provided by moto for moto, and may be used by others such as ebikes, mountain bikes, hikers, and horses. As a local, I support this project "as long as all OHV funds are clearly used for OHV access in our public lands". Dr. Todd M. Wold - 5/1/2026

I am writing in support of the grant application submitted by Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship for their ground operations. SBTS is doing fantastic work in our region and the financial resources provided by this grant will allow them to continue and build upon their great work. John Manocchio - 5/1/2026

Please give much needed grant money to Sierra Buttes Trails. We love mountain biking around Downieville. Sierra Buttes build the best trails and we would like to see more trails and the current trails maintained. Tamara DeGiovanni - 5/1/2026

I am asking that this grand proposal be funded in order to encourage continued development, use and hopefully expansion of this trail system that has a significant/positive financial impact on both Downieville and Sierraville while providing recreation/access to some of California most remote and historical areas. Laura Christofk - 5/1/2026

We need the trails and the awesome work the stewardship provides. I come from out of area to use the trails and support the local businesses while I am there. Kimberly Horner - 5/2/2026

To whom it may concern, please support the trail stewardship to keep Downieville a top premier destination for off highway vehicle recreation. Riders visit local restaurants and shops and providing income for the community. Brian Fiala - 5/2/2026

I've been riding the trails in Downieville since early 90's and am now also riding in Quincy. The SBTS has been and is instrumental not only in building, supporting and maintaining these trails which so many enjoy and incorporate as a main part of their lives, but they have a profound affect on the towns' existing community. And "community" is the key term. They have brought together a biking community on so many levels and enhance the existing community. Every non profit and business should look at SBTS as a great role model demonstrating passion, integrity, hard work, and love for community. Jeanne Kirschner - 5/3/2026

Recreation opportunities for visitors and locals. Creating local employment. Creating sustainable trail systems that require less maintenance. Keeping trails open and safe while protecting watersheds. Jeremiah Haverfield - 5/3/2026

I support this grant and the Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship. The Downieville trail system is a terrific public community resource that is vital to the economy of Sierra County. Spencer Smith - 5/3/2026

With a grant request of nearly 2.5 million and most going to salaries for this group, I hope the commission/entity reviewing applications such as this takes a concerned and measured approach to the requests from SCMF and reduce it accordingly. I also find it disheartening they (SCMF) are asking for more grant money than the entire Los Padres and Angeles National Forest's in California combined! With OHV opportunities reducing, closures increasing and environmental group pressures in California growing, I'm asking the grant program to focus on fulfilling public agency grants for OHV trail maintenance and limiting some of the extremely large requests that go to anti OHV groups and salaries such as this Thank you for your time, Tomm -3/6/2026